Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (50055)	8/2/2013 3:48:10 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

let's see.... You don't know the stock, but are able to surmise that even though the job description of a very highly paid CEO is to account for "exogenous factors"(otherwise they could just hire a mail room clerk if the company can run on autopilot), he should still be paid for what was contracted. But the workers at the bottom? No. Even though they "contracted" for their pensions, they should be screwed. I've got to admit, you really should submit this one to Leno: "maybe some stockholders had higher expectations than others. " yeah, maybe they should have expected to pay a guy $6,000,000 a year for life that destroyed over a $100B in company value. LOL!