Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (50109)	8/3/2013 3:13:46 PM
From: Broken_Clock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

He was posting about a CEO signing on for taking the company through the bankruptcy, that would not be likely to be the old CEO, at least not if the old CEO clearly made the mistakes that lead to the bankruptcy. === That's your interpretation of what he said. as for this: "that would not be likely to be the old CEO, at least not if the old CEO clearly made the mistakes that lead to the bankruptcy." I'd like to see data on tat one! Not my experience at all. Still, you're both evading the core of my question... Why should a CEO be compensated so obscenely for obvious bad performance, you both justify it, then come out anti-union as if the workers are the core of the problem so let's take away their pensions.