Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (41776)	8/5/2013 3:13:55 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86355

Hi Bilow, Re you non comprehension of good physics There is nothing false in anything I said. infinitesimal is not zero. Let us say the sun can warm the earth 25 degrees in 12 hours. How many 12 hours are there in a century. 876000. So what is that 1 part in 10,000 over 866000 hours supposed to do in heating. I call that infinitesimal. Let me qualify that. Supposed to do by the bogus assertion and bad physics of all AGW theory. In the atmosphere of earth the density and often the temperature of air is dominated by the partial pressure of H20 or the dew point. Fact, in any dry air of equal Volume and Temperature and Pressure, the higher the partial pressure of CO2 the higher the density. The point is in air, if the partial pressure of CO2 is higher, then any Partial pressure of H20 will have more lift. The proffer of cooling, infinitesimal cooling by higher concentrations of more CO2 is infinitely more valid physics than the delusional physics of CO2 caused global warming.