Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (40015)	8/5/2013 4:07:10 AM
From: Giordano Bruno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Have fun. blogtalkradio.com Wonder if the embassy staffs like it underground?

To: longnshort who wrote (40015)	8/5/2013 7:45:35 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 69300

"those researchers work for the gov and authorities" I guess you figure (because of all the honest research you have done from your armchair) that all science is thus bogus and contaminated? All those articles (and original research papers for people such as yourself) are untrustworthy. So applied science must scare the shit out of you? No parachutes? No flying? And of course you don't drive. And no doubt the moon landings were complete hoaxes. The following article (and all such research that gets reported) is just garbage sciencedaily.com Or maybe you just mean that only scientists who study climate change are all liars? You think that the 97% of scientists with consensus are paid off while the 3 % of deniers are working for free. Hmmm! Most rational people believe that it is the 3% who are being paid to fudge and arrive at desirable results while it is the 97% who honor their calling and their consciences. Of course, these are honest "feelings" you get from your armchair, so who can deny them?? climate.nasa.gov