Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (731253)	8/6/2013 1:27:42 PM
From: i-node	3 Recommendations Recommended By steve harris Tenchusatsu TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575165

So, is Z saying that unemployment would be at 6% without the sequester? Because there is that little problem with the U6 that flatly refutes that claim.

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (731253)	8/6/2013 8:18:52 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575165

>(a) You added to the unemployment figure. You should have subtracted. Huh? When you cut jobs, you add to unemployment. >(b) If the ratio of percent budget to percent unemployment is 2:1, then one tenth of a percent in the budget would lead to a drop of 0.05 percentage points in unemployment. What? That makes no sense at all. >Once again, I'm not going to repeat myself. You are repeating yourself, in essence. You said nothing, and now you're saying nothing again. -Z