Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (731291)	8/6/2013 3:31:21 PM
From: TopCat	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576177

"Who knows? What we do know is that it would be better than it is." You don't know jack.

To: combjelly who wrote (731291)	8/6/2013 3:36:11 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1576177

>> Who knows? What we do know is that it would be better than it is. And how, exactly, do "we" know that? After all, "We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work....After [4.5] years of this administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started...and an enormous debt to boot!"

To: combjelly who wrote (731291)	8/6/2013 3:43:07 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 one_less Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576177

CJ, And your proof is....? This is so typical of you libtards. You come up with a bullshit statement like "unemployment would have been under 6% without the sequester," then demand the other side disprove it. A 2-3% difference in the federal budget does NOT make a difference of one and a half percentage points in unemployment. That's absurd on its face, and for you to play up this sort of stupidity is extremely childish. Tenchusatsu