Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (158719)	8/9/2013 10:13:29 PM
From: Paul V.	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 224778

longnshort, The teachers union is gonna march for trayvon, lolololol what, what do teachers have to do with trayvon. If I were trayvon, under the Florida's laws of "right to carry," and "stand your ground," and an individual following me in the dead of night, would have packed iron, turned around kill the follower, especially if the conditions were as we have heard the details. It would have been your word of self-defense vs a dead person who had been stalking me in the dead of night. Plus the stalker would have violated the instructions of the police by getting out of the car. Then, we would have a good criminal attorney to defend me if necessary. longnshort and Kenneth, explain to me how the above logic is inaccurate!! The Florida Prosecutor would have the burden of proof. They have to prove to a jury that I violated current Florida's laws and the convict me without "a reasonable doubt." The burden of proof would be on the part of the State of Florida that I acted otherwise. But, there would be no other witnesses other than what the discussion was between the dispatcher and the stalker who told the stalker not to get out of their car.