Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (731871)	8/9/2013 10:43:56 AM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1576329

lolol yeah dems don't lust for power, that's why they said after they lost the house in 1994 that if they get the house back ' they would pass laws so they would never lose it again' you should stick to what you know best, Wiener's dick

To: combjelly who wrote (731871)	8/9/2013 12:19:58 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1576329

Ten's fine with Asians like his parents immigrating, but Hispanics that work just as hard if not harder, lock the gate!

To: combjelly who wrote (731871)	8/9/2013 2:25:31 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1576329

CJ, I'll ignore the other meaningless parts of your post and address the only interesting one: There are many positive aspects to immigration reform. It would be a huge help for SSI and Medicare. I've heard this argument before. Since the current citizens of the U.S. aren't having enough children to bear the burden of retiree benefits, we need to import them from other countries. I personally go back-n-forth on this. In essence, I agree, but then again I've always been an advocate for LEGAL immigration. On the other hand, the way SS and Medicare is set up, we would have to continually increase the population of America in order to support retirees simply because life expectancies are a lot higher than back when SS and Medicare were set up. But either way, this argument of yours falls short because you are assuming that "immigration reform" is about immigration in general. No it isn't. It's about illegal immigration, specifically what to do with the millions of "undocumented" immigrants in America who essentially cut in line. Like I said, "immigration reform" is a synonym for "amnesty," which has been tried before. Didn't work then, won't work now, but it's always going to be pushed by the very party that stands to win the most amount of votes from it, i.e. Democrats. Tenchusatsu