SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (158722)8/9/2013 12:39:34 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224778
 
Philips...."Further, federal term limits violate the Constitution."....

Cut the crap Philips you care NOTHING about the Constitution of the USA You adore the great anti-constitution resident in the White House!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (158722)8/9/2013 2:36:53 PM
From: Jack of All Trades2 Recommendations

Recommended By
rayrohn
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224778
 
Top 10 Questions Journalists Won't Ask President Obama at Press Conference


President Barack Obama rarely makes himself available to the mainstream media. They adore him anyway. At rare press conferences, such as the one scheduled for noon Friday at the White House, they lob softball questions or accept his evasive, meandering answers, rarely pressing him for clarity, much less truth. But there are many questions that the president ought to answer, yet which he is unlikely to face at all.

10.
In 2008 you promised not to "do an end-run around Congress" with signing statements. Yet you have used signing statements and you have taken executive actions to circumvent Congress on immigration and other issues. Recently, you decided the employer mandate will not be enforced on October 1. Yet that date is stipulated by law. Doesn't the Obamacare delay violate your powers under the Constitution?

9. Last week we learned that dozens of CIA personnel were in Benghazi at the time of the attack, and that there may be ongoing efforts to suppress information about what actually happened. In October 2012, you said that you issued three directives when you learned of the attack, yet these have never been seen. What did you actually do during the Benghazi attack, and why weren't you more actively involved?

8. Last month, IRS officials testified to Congress that IRS Chief Counsel William J. Wilkins, whom you appointed, was directly involved in reviewing applications for non-profit status by Tea Party groups. He also met with you in April 2012, prior to issuing new "Be on the Lookout" (BOLO) criteria for evaluating such applications. What was your personal knowledge of the IRS scrutiny of conservative groups?

7. Recently your administration launched a new round of peace negotiations between Israel and Palestinian leaders. Israel had repeatedly said that it would negotiate without preconditions, but Palestinian leaders would not. Your administration, through Secretary of State John Kerry, pressed Israel to release 104 terrorists from Israeli jails. Was there a single new concession you demanded from Palestinians?

6. You have publicly dressed down the U.S. military on the issue of sexual assault. In the 2012 campaign, you were very involved in specific controversies, even calling Sandra Fluke, for example. Yet you have refused to say anything about the conduct of a fellow Democrat, Mayor Bob Filner of San Diego, who refuses to resign. Aren't you setting a bad example on sexual assault, as commander-in-chief, in the Filner case?

5. Edward Snowden has continued to reveal new information about the National Security Agency's abilities to gather information about Americans' private communications. Leaving aside the question of whether the government should have that power, or whether you have broken past promises on civil liberties, the fact that these leaks happened at all is striking. Why is Gen. Keith Alexander still the head of the NSA?

4. Recently you announced that you were canceling a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, over the Snowden issue and gay rights. Yet last month, even after Putin indicated he might offer Snowden asylum, you were still offering drastic cuts in America's nuclear arsenal. It looks like the "reset" with Russia is a failure, after so many concessions. Isn't it time to stop offering new cuts to U.S. nuclear weapons?

3. You are backing the Senate immigration bill, which passed because Democrats agreed to include border security measures. Regardless of whether those measures are sufficient, they depend on a commitment to enforce the law as written. Yet you have refused to enforce existing immigration laws, even imposing a so-called "Dream Act" by fiat. Why should Americans trust you to enforce a new immigration law?

2. You campaigned on the promise to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan. Yet you have helped the Taliban open a new office in Qatar, complicating relations with President Hamid Karzai, and recently suggested that there could be a "zero option" in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, as the U.S. withdraws, Al Qaeda is on the offensive across the region, and might return. Are we not repeating the mistakes of the past in Afghanistan?

1. You are about to head into a new round of budget negotiations. Some Republicans leaders have suggested that they are willing to offer concessions on the budget sequester if you commit to entitlement reform. You have spoken in theory about making some cuts but have never presented a plan, on paper, and have rejected all suggestions, even the Simpson-Bowles commission. Where is your plan to reform entitlements?

Bonus question: Last month, you spoke at length about how the African-American community views the death of Trayvon Martin case. You also asked people to respect the decision of the jury. Yet your Department of Justice is still aggressively investigating George Zimmerman, who is living in hiding, though all previous investigations showed no racial bias. Aren't you violating Zimmerman's civil rights?

UPDATE - Additional bonus question (from the comments): When you signed the Affordable Care Act, it included the Grassley amendment, subjecting members of Congress and their staff to the same rules as everyone else. Yet this week you signed off on special subsidies for members of Congress and their staff. Given your focus on inequality, how do you justify giving Congress Obamacare subsidies?

UPDATE 2 - Another bonus question (via Twitter): There is no longer any doubt that Nidal Hasan was motivated by radical Islamist beliefs. In May, you actually acknowledged for the first time that the Ft. Hood attack was an act of "Islamic jihad." Yet your administration still considers is "workplace violence," which denies victims certain benefits. Isn't it time to declare the Ft. Hood shootings a terrorist act?

breitbart.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (158722)8/9/2013 6:47:11 PM
From: Follies1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224778
 
Short on specifics other than term limits. Many states have term limits. They don't seem to help much. Further, federal term limits violate the Constitution.


Which clause is that?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (158722)8/10/2013 9:10:28 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation

Recommended By
lorne

  Respond to of 224778
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (158722)8/10/2013 11:37:12 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224778
 
Health rates to 'soar' in Ohio and Florida...

Insurance ratings dropped from CA website...

OR delays full access to exchange...

Insurers Flee...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (158722)8/10/2013 11:37:46 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 224778
 
REID: OBAMACARE JUST STEP TOWARDS SINGLE-PAYER

who didn't know this



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (158722)8/10/2013 1:24:13 PM
From: lorne  Respond to of 224778
 
Black senator blasts Harry Reid for suggesting Republicans are racist

08/09/2013

Alex Pappas
Political Reporter
dailycaller.com

The only black lawmaker in the U.S. Senate blasted Senate majority leader Harry Reid on Friday for comments suggesting Republican opposition to President Barack Obama is the result of racism.

South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, a Republican, called on the Nevada Democrat to apologize after saying during a radio interview on Friday that he hopes Republican opposition to Obama is “based on substance and not the fact that he’s African-American.”

“I am sincerely disappointed by continued attempts to divide the American people by playing to the lowest common denominator,” Scott said.

“Instead of engaging in serious debate about the failed policies of this administration – from the ever-increasing burdens created by the national health care reform plan to the tax and spend approach to economic recovery, along with countless others – Democrats are once again trying to hide behind a smokescreen,” the Republican said.

Added Scott: “Our country deserves more from those in Washington. I hope Senator Reid will realize the offensive nature of his remarks and apologize to those who disagree with the President’s policies because of one thing – they are hurting hardworking American families.”