SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (732520)8/14/2013 5:04:27 AM
From: FJB3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
joseffy
TideGlider

  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1578900
 
Why Is Voter ID So Popular?



If you tune in to MSNBC this week, there’s a good chance you’ll witness a mostly white panel wearing geek specs wringing their hands over North Carolina’s new voter ID law. When talking heads are not dropping buzz words like “racial discrimination” to criticize the policy, they scoff at the argument that voter fraud is a real issue for America to focus on.

Right now voter ID is polling at 83% approval, according to a McClatchy-Marist study. But even more fascinating is the broad demographic support for the election integrity policy. Although favorability is off the charts across all indicators, there are some narrative-busting trends. You’re more likely to support voter ID if you’re not white, make less than $50,000, and are female.

How can a policy like voter ID become so popular in our polarized culture? Trust in one another is dropping to zero. If voting is the great equalizer, voter ID is the insurance policy.

When Indiana’s law, the original voter ID, was challenged before the Supreme Court, Justice Stephens supported the idea of voter ID because no amount of fraud is acceptable. Since then, the Court has ruled in favor of promoting faith in electoral systems instead of waiting for an issue to reach epidemic levels before taking action.

Rational Americans inherently understand the threat of fraud – in all forms. They see the frailties in the system each time they go to vote. We remember the ACORN headlines. We remember the dramatic election of 2000. We grow up hearing local stories of organized crime stuffing ballot boxes. Our history books tell of corrupt political machines.

Despite our understanding of the risks of fraud, we are treated to a political class and media that attack anyone who dare counteract the problem. In 2008, the Organizing for America Chief Counsel requested that the Department of Justice investigate individuals who publicly discussed voter fraud. Last week the Maryland State Board of Elections sneered at a local citizen and argued that it had no duty to answer questions received about voter roll maintenance. This week, MSNBC attacked Politico for daring to quote True the Vote on election law reforms.

Why is this popular voter ID so "controversial"? It makes the jobs of political operatives that prey on a weak system more difficult. It also proves the privileged northeastern academics' racial generalizations are wrong.

Above all, the popularity of voter ID demonstrates that even if you are a person of color or don’t make much money, you do not believe that you are incapable of taking responsibility for your vote.

Broad demographic support for voter ID is an existential threat to interest groups that have lined their pockets for decades by profiting from the social discord they themselves have sown. In the months ahead we will see these groups go all in to try and protect their power base by attempting to reverse this popular trend. Let them try. Americans are sick of the histrionics, and they're choosing common sense over contrived conflict.

Catherine Engelbrecht is the Founder and President of True the Vote, America’s leading voters’ rights and election integrity organization.



To: i-node who wrote (732520)8/14/2013 12:45:40 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1578900
 
Retirees in Enemy Territory Go Door-to-Door on Obamacare
By Alex Nussbaum - Aug 14, 2013 12:00 AM ET
bloomberg.com

Republican governors seeking to make their states enemy territory for Obamacare are facing a counteroffensive. Among the vanguard: two 74-year-old retirees walking the streets of working-class New Jersey.

Margot Lee and Claude Cesard recently went door-to-door to pitch the health law’s benefits. They’re among thousands of supporters mobilized by the nonprofit group Enroll America to encourage the uninsured to sign up for the Affordable Care Act’s new health plans, one household at a time.

The campaign is relying on tactics honed in Obama’s election victories to promote the law in states where leaders such as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie have shown little support. Low enrollment early on could deal the act a serious blow, raising costs for consumers, bolstering Republican attacks and deepening public skepticism. Success could smooth its path into the future.

“It’s a cause we believe in,” said Lee, a retired attorney, as she canvassed homes last month in Englewood, New Jersey, five miles west of New York City. “Health care in this country is a mess, and this is a step in the right direction.”

Lee got her start in political activism in 1948 at age 10, helping her grandmother hand out fliers for Harry Truman’s election. She registered voters for Obama in 2008 and 2012, and felt compelled to act this year after seeing relatives struggle without insurance, she said.

It’s her job to help counter “the big lie” being pushed by the law’s critics, Lee said.

Unfavorable Surveys It won’t be an easy task. In June, the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation found 43 percent of people had an unfavorable view of the law, compared with 35 percent in support. An April survey by the group, which studies health-care policy, found 40 percent weren’t even sure the measure was still in effect

“You can’t just turn on the exchanges Oct. 1 and expect people to show up,” Thomas Buchmueller, a University of Michigan health economist, said in a telephone interview. “For a lot of people, it’s just not on their radar screen.”

Enrollment is scheduled to begin Oct. 1 through new call centers and online exchanges created by the act. As in an election, turnout will be crucial. The Obama administration has estimated about 40 percent of the new enrollees need to be young and healthy, to offset an older, sicker population expected to flood into the market. Without that balance, premiums may soar.

10 States Enroll America is concentrating its efforts on 10 states, including Texas, Florida and New Jersey, many of them with elected officials who’ve shown little interest in promoting the law. The Washington-based group, led by a former Obama campaign field director, has organized 3,000 volunteers so far. It’s working with local partners, from churches to health clinics to barbershops, to advance the message.

The goal is to contact potential enrollees at least a half-dozen times, said Mimi Garcia, the group’s director in Texas.

“It might be somebody on their doorstep,” Garcia said in a telephone interview. “And then they go to church, and their pastor is talking about it. There’s a table with information afterwards at the Sunday social, and then they’re going to CVS and there’s info about it at the pharmacy. It’s all of these different messages that are going to make an impact.”

The effort, like Obama’s political campaigns, is driven by target lists culled from opinion surveys and carefully mined consumer data.

In New Jersey, Christie has vetoed bills seeking to set up a state insurance exchange. That’s put the state among 27 that have refused to run their own markets, instead leaving the work to the Obama administration and its allies.

Pitching Englewood Lee and Cesard took the pitch to Englewood recently, knocking on doors in a neighborhood of converted bungalows and aging Colonials. They carried maps with red dots showing where the uninsured lived. Color-coded charts explained the law’s new insurance subsidies for consumers.

Their script from Enroll America didn’t mention “Obamacare” or the “Affordable Care Act,” potential red flags in the political war over the health-care overhaul. Instead, it stressed the “new health coverage options that will make it easier to afford quality health insurance.”

Lee and Cesard both get their health care through Medicare, the U.S.-funded program for the elderly. Cesard, a retired engineer, said the kind of security he gets from the U.S. plan seems to be drifting away for many Americans.

“I have a plan that works fine for me, but that’s not the case for everyone,” he said. “I’m concerned for the younger people, for my sons and grandsons.”

Unanswered Doors The pair mostly knocked and found no answers on a sunny Saturday afternoon. Those who did come to the door mirrored the national conversation, offering a mix of confusion, contempt and hope for the law.

Fernando Perez, a construction worker, told the pair his insurer had raised the copay for a medicine he needed by tenfold, to $200. He blamed Obamacare.

Insurance is “expensive to begin with, and now it’s going to cost even more,” he said afterwards, in an interview with a reporter who accompanied the volunteers.

“If you need to go out and sell it and have a campaign,” he said, “it can’t be that good.”

A few doors away, the canvassers found more support from Diego Arenas, an uninsured truck driver who said he’d been without coverage for “many years.”

Talking across a fence decorated by a tumble of pink roses, Arenas, 50, said he’d suffered with a sore shoulder for more than a year because he couldn’t afford a health plan. When he finally went to a hospital, he left with a Tylenol and a bill for $3,200, he said.

‘Something Good’ “Every time I need to go to the doctor, I pay $800, $700,” he said. The law sounded like “something good for people in the lower-middle class.”

He smiled politely at the older pair as they handed him a brochure.

“We don’t want everything from the government,” Arenas said. “But a little help, especially in this economy, I think it’s a good idea.”

Aida Cortez, 44, said she, her husband and two young daughters had lost their coverage at the start of the year because of “paperwork problems.” Her solution has been to “take better care of myself, exercise more, eat right,” she said. Still, she worried about her children, she said.

While the health law sounded promising, she hadn’t kept up on the details, Cortez told Lee. Would it be an HMO, or health maintenance organization, the kind of insurance plan that keeps tight reins on the doctors members can visit?

One Option That’d be one option, Lee told her. The law’s tax subsidies, she said, could offer help in affording the plans.

Would Obamacare cover everybody in the house?

“It’s for everyone in America,” Lee said.

Lee and Cesard departed, moving slowly in the midday heat and humidity. After two hours, they’d knocked on more than a dozen unanswered doors, found one skeptic, a few supporters and several people, like Cortez, who were unsure about the law’s provisions or confused about its potential effects.

Lee called it a success.

“Anytime you can talk to people who don’t know about the law and give them some information, that’s a success,” she said. “This is just the first step. These people, we’ll be contacting them again.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Alex Nussbaum in New York at anussbaum1@bloomberg.net