Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (732797)	8/15/2013 1:45:23 PM
From: Bill	3 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 jlallen one_less Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579010

Juror intimidation is against the law. No such intimidation existed. The facts were plain as day. Every one of those jurors knows Zimmerman would be dead today if he hadn't defended himself. Your theory of events was thoroughly disproven by the facts.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (732797)	8/15/2013 1:45:26 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1579010

At least one juror wanted to find him guilty but was intimidated..... I have no doubt he killed the kid intentionally but via manslaughter.... Nonsense. That lefty canard was specficially refuted by the juror you claim was intimidated...she specifically said she could not vote to convict in the end because the evidence was not there.... And, yes, we should ignore the evidence and convict people on the basis of your feelings...lol What a doofus!!!

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (732797)	8/15/2013 1:51:52 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1579010

Keep lying, lefty.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (732797)	8/15/2013 2:04:21 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579010

prove it "At least one juror wanted to find him guilty but was intimidated."

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (732797)	8/15/2013 3:03:18 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	4 Recommendations Recommended By Bill Brumar89 i-node joseffy Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579010

Shep, At least one juror wanted to find him guilty but was intimidated..... I have no doubt he killed the kid intentionally but via manslaughter.... a) There was no juror intimidation. Juror pressure, maybe: huffingtonpost.com b) What about the other five jurors? Funny how their opinions don't matter to you. Tenchusatsu

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (732797)	8/15/2013 3:11:29 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By joseffy TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579010

>> At least one juror wanted to find him guilty but was intimidated. No. The juror you're referring to, said this: "We had to grab our hearts and put it aside and look at the evidence . . . " "George Zimmerman got away with murder, but you can't get away from God. And at the end of the day, he's going to have a lot of questions and answers he has to deal with," she said. But "the law couldn't prove it." So, even though she, personally, had the opinion he was guilty, she flatly stated there simply wasn't evidence to support it. That is not being "intimidated". That is following the law.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (732797)	8/16/2013 1:22:12 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Recommended By d[-_-]b FJB joseffy Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1579010

I have no doubt that trayvon being high on drugs and brainwashed about evil whitey was looking to kill a white person that night