SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (733274)8/18/2013 1:43:35 AM
From: bentway2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Celtictrader
J_F_Shepard

  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1576842
 
Why the Young and Healthy Should Embrace ObamaCare

EZRA KLEIN: THEY'RE NOT GOING TO BE YOUNG AND HEALTHY FOREVER

By John Johnson, Newser Staff
newser.com
Posted Aug 17, 2013 11:24 AM CDT

(NEWSER) – Critics of ObamaCare are more and more using this line of attack, observes Ezra Klein at Bloomberg: It's unfair to force young, healthy to buy health insurance in order to subsidize the insurance of older, sicker people. The critics are distorting the facts, writes Klein, but it is true that "a small number of young people—the ones who have the lowest risk and least need for insurance—are being asked to pay more than the current market calculates they should." So doesn't it make sense for them to skip ObamaCare and pay the (cheaper) penalty instead? No, says Klein.

It's not just that they might get into a car accident and go broke without coverage. There's a bigger issue: "Those young, healthy rich people will need a functional system in the future when they become older, sicker or poorer," writes Klein, and these reforms are a way to make sure it will be there. "So even for those least in need, health-insurance premiums are an investment—not in someone else’s future, but in their own." Click for his full column.



To: i-node who wrote (733274)8/18/2013 1:59:47 AM
From: Don Hurst  Read Replies (11) | Respond to of 1576842
 
As I have noted before, Benghazi was a CIA operation that they wanted to keep secret and had taken over security for Benghazi. Stevens was a very brave American who clearly knew the situation in Benghazi and the consulate but took chances with his security, probably unnecessary.

But what about the rest of Keane's comments when he says they did all that was possible to aid during the incident.