To: bentway who wrote (733329 ) 8/18/2013 4:59:33 PM From: one_less Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578938 Graham said that although our aid might not be that significant in terms of quantity, he insisted it has symbolic value. Withdrawing it, the Senator claimed, would send a strong message to western tourists, investors, and allies. The aid gives us a foothold. The majority of the aid must set aside to purchase military industrial products from the USA. Some of it must be used for academic development (advanced degrees) which must be earned at an American University. In other words the aid ends up being a wash and the money returns to the USA, stimulating our own economy. We also need to maintain a working relationship for strategic interests, like the Suez canal and the treaty brokerage that has been accessible through Egypt.Graham, however, said that the whole situation came about because former President Morsi was "overplaying his hand." He insisted that if the military restored democracy, the Brotherhood "would be creamed" in an election. Members of the Brotherhood were underground prior to the fall of Mubarak, because any fundamentalists would be jailed in Egypt. The same was true throughout the ME prior to the "Arab Spring." The military sponsored government represents the conservative interests who want a return to that status by designating them as a terrorist organization. The liberals, who initially organized the protests against Mubarak, got duped into an end run by the Brotherhood who promised them a decent life of being able to practice their religion and participate in public life without threats from a repressive government. When the liberals realized they had been duped, they returned to the streets to protest the Brotherhood. The Brotherhood would not win a new election but they will continue violent retribution against the state, less fundamental factions of Islam, and non-Muslim entities. That is who they are.