Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (136085)	8/22/2013 4:59:31 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 149317

"There has been no course correction," since Raygun. It's EZ to do, if the teabaggers trying to break the system get out of the way. Simply removing the cap on earnings will do it. Things can be changed; not even the 10 Commandments are writ in stone. How Would You Fix Social Security? By Kevin Drum \| Sat Jul. 10, 2010 9:32 AM PDT Responding to yesterday's post showing that high-income men live quite a bit longer than low-income men, an anonymous commenter writes: [1] The data is a very strong argument for removing the ceiling on Social Security payments — that is, collecting Social Security on 100% of wages, no matter how high (while not adjusting benefits). That's because the Social Security system, now, assumes that life expectancy is the same for low-income and high-income workers, while in fact low-income workers collect benefits for far fewer years. So higher-income workers should pay more than they do today. That's an interesting point, no? Fair is fair. (Though you can adjust that 100% to 90% or 95% or whatever floats your social equity boat.) And while we're on the subject, the Congressional Budget Office recently issued a report (here [2]) that includes a nice table that allows you to play the Social Security game from the comfort of your own home. Basically, CBO estimates that Social Security is out of balance by 0.6% of GDP over the next 75 years, which means you need to come up with a basket of changes from their list that adds up to 0.6%. So choose away and build your own Social Security rescue plan! And when you're done with that relatively trivial exercise, it'll be time to move on to Medicare. Unfortunately, that's a wee bit harder and no handy little table will provide the answers. Which, of course, is why people prefer spending their time on Social Security. It's mostly grandstanding, but if they ever actually fixed it they'd have no choice but to tackle genuinely difficult problems. And what kind of moron gets elected to Congress to do that? <img src="http://www.motherjones.com/files/images/Blog_Social_Security_CBO_Options.jpg" Source URL: motherjones.com Links: [1] motherjones.com [2] cbo.gov