SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Microsoft - The Evil empire -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (411)12/9/1997 1:32:00 AM
From: ahhaha  Respond to of 1600
 
UNIX for Windows NT?

"Some of Softway's literature is confusing, so let's begin by looking at what OpenNT will and will not do. This is not a UNIX operating system that is hosted by NT. It does not have the ability to execute binaries created for PC UNIX. It also does nothing to resolve printer and file-sharing issues. What OpenNT does for you depends on your work. If you're a UNIX user who wants a more UNIX-like environment on your NT system, OpenNT can do that...Architecturally, OpenNT runs on top of NT's neglected POSIX Layer. Softway reworked NT's POSIX functionality, replacing it with code that Softway claims is significantly enhanced. POSIX is not a layer, actually, but rather an API that quietly translates UNIX function calls to Windows equivalents. Neither the POSIX API nor OpenNT run at kernel Level. That's both good and bad. It's good because OpenNT has all the protection afforded every user-level process. If it goes astray, it has limited ability to harm other processes. Access to files and other resources is governed by the access rights granted to the logged-in user. The downside is that a faithful emulation of UNIX requires kernel-level support. When you don't have kernel privileges, you must pick and choose (as Softway has) which features
to live without."

Fron Tom Yager's (tyager@maxx.net.net) review of OpenNT (www.opennt.com) in "Windows NT Systems", Jan '98.



To: ahhaha who wrote (411)12/27/1997 10:30:00 PM
From: paul  Respond to of 1600
 
Sun has never had 70% of the server market - they still currently lag HP in commercial Unix Server Shipments. SUN is still relatively a small company - like Microsoft they have revenues in the $8 billion dollar range compared to IBM who is over 80 Billion and HP around 40 Billion. Sun has 20% of the commercial UNIX server market but is coming on strong - they have about 50% of the technical Workstation market.