SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John who wrote (87035)8/25/2013 10:43:53 PM
From: Wayners  Respond to of 103300
 
I agree but I think I have a better way to explain it and I had the thought in my mind in my previous post. The elites support and coddle the inferiors and give them equal votes in order to secure the elites power from the masses. That doesn't require any explanation because you and I understand that fully. It's artificial selection that can only work in the short term. I think because of this artificial order created by the elites, when it goes wrong because it violates the natural order, it doesn't just correct the crimes against the natural order, it has to go further than that and take out a large chunk of those that fought the natural order as well. The law of entropy requires that, in a system, order such as artificial selection is created for a time, that has to be made up for by an increase in disorder somewhere else. Clearly the universe is an extremely large system, but it seems to me that the disorder is most likely to occur right back where it started and take out a large chunk of the idiots that fought Darwin to begin with. Think of it this way, is it more energy efficient for the disorder and chaos to occur a trillion trillion miles from the Earth under the law of entropy or is it more efficient for the system to just take out a big chunk of the elites right here where it happened. The universe works under efficiency and a hundred years is basically a snap shot.