SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robohogs who wrote (180240)8/26/2013 1:28:18 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 206326
 
I read the comments. For what it's worth, in the North Sea, an area where there has been at lot of
seismic mapping and oil and gas exploration and exploitation over the years, whales and dolphins are
on the increase.

Dolphins on the increase.
dolphincareuk.org

A recent study recorded sightings of six different species in an area stretching from North Northumberland to Whitby North Yorkshire and beyond down to the Humber. The species recorded were Harbour Porpoise, Common Dolphin, Bottlenose Dolphin, Risso's Dolphin, Long-finned pilot whales and White-Beaked Dolphin.

Rising water temperature and the abundance of food, such as herring and mackerel, now available are thought to be among the factors responsible for the increased numbers of whales and dolphins being reported from some parts of the North Sea...

...A local fisherman says the presence of Risso's dolphins in the North Sea could also be because of an increase in the numbers of squid, which are an important food source for Risso's, as well as for White-beaked and common dolphins and the Long-finned pilot whale...

====

I don't think the remark by the dolphin expert was well thought out or supported by evidence.
She probably regrets making it.



To: Robohogs who wrote (180240)8/26/2013 4:30:44 PM
From: tom pope  Respond to of 206326
 
Hell,it got a unanimous 4 "likes".



To: Robohogs who wrote (180240)8/28/2013 4:34:02 PM
From: Jacob Snyder5 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bearcatbob
Brian Sullivan
Bruce L
Salt'n'Peppa
xxreno

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206326
 
<dolphins are in danger – from fracking>

I read the article and comments. My comments:

1. None of the dangers are quantified. It's the same as saying, "Fukushima radiation reaches California," a true but trivial fact, because the radiation dosage is less than you'll get by taking an airplane. How close and how loud (in hard reproducible numbers) harms dolphins? No relevant facts presented.

2. <sound travels five times faster underwater than through the air> is a true but irrelevant fact. Intensity, degradation rate in water, and duration might matter, but not speed. The author, like most journalists, probably stopped taking science classes after the 8th Grade, so he or she is illiterate about the basic concepts of physics, chemistry, geology, biology, etc.

3. <they (dolphins) home in on pregnant women because, apparently, their echo-location can sense that there is something moving within the woman’s body.> This is an:
Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones is a logical fallacy which uses the manipulation of the recipient's emotions, rather than valid logic, to win an argument. The appeal to emotion fallacy uses emotions as the basis of an argument's position without factual evidence that logically supports the major ideas endorsed...
en.wikipedia.org

4. I'll take this seriously, if you can find one (just one) article in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which quantifies the risk to dolphins from underwater fracking, in the North Sea or any body of water. Otherwise, I'll just keep pointing out the logical fallacies.

5. <the kindest thing humans can do is kill off 95% of their own population> I've deleted several responses to that....speaks for itself...

Disclosure: I'm an environmentalist who believes in the Gaia Hypothesis. en.wikipedia.org I've been arrested, years ago, protesting for environmental causes. But articles like that just make scientifically literate people laugh at environmentalists.