Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (734975)	8/26/2013 12:43:05 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Recommended By Taro Respond to of 1579807

My concern is that we stop arming the Islamic terrorists and that it be determined exactly who delivered the gas attack. I care about both things too, but I don't want to see either side claim victory here. An outcome I would support is a constitutional government with free elections, human rights, and enforceable rule of law. We are not even close to that.

To: TideGlider who wrote (734975)	8/26/2013 2:29:57 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By simplicity Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579807

TG, My concern is that we stop arming the Islamic terrorists and that it be determined exactly who delivered the gas attack. Just because Assad is a dictator doesn't mean "he did it". The Islamic Terrorist "opposition" forces have the greatest motivation to have used the WMD in order to get the west to pound Assad into submission. Regardless of motivations, whoever did it clearly was desperate enough to resort to such a horror. I'm all for staying neutral, but there comes a point where even that is no longer a luxury. We need to get to the bottom of it, or else both sides will be motivated to use chemical weapons even more. Tenchusatsu