Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (24884)	12/8/1997 2:20:00 PM
From: Ellen	Respond to of 55532

Exactly, Pugs!

To: Pugs who wrote (24884)	12/8/1997 2:32:00 PM
From: KMT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs: Yes, I would feel MK and company should be held responsible if alleged slander is actually slander. As a trained investigator I would have thought RG would have the common sense to refute MK's comments with information other than Morgan states it's full of "half-truths" & "slanderous". That's like RG going to a suspect and asking, "did you do it?", then accepting his answer and closing the investigation? Not saying that RMIL is suspect, but they certainly are if MK's information is accurate. And if he hasn't given you cartel folks anything more then "Morgan says so", then I'd say you all are working toward's becoming "accomplices" if you let it go at that and MK proves to be correct. This is really beginning to surprise me given how many of you have boated about how good your DD is. Cheers, KMT