Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joseffy who wrote (735279)	8/28/2013 5:38:10 AM
From: Taro	3 Recommendations Recommended By Jorj X Mckie joseffy TideGlider Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1582684

No doubt in my mind and even slowly some of the media reluctanty coming to the same conclusion, that the rebels released the gas. Now, that said, however: "If you back Assad you are backing Russia and Iran. If you back the rebels, you are backing something like Islamic Brotherhood. So it seems to me that best is just let them fight each other. Why not? Bomb Assad a little if he seems to be getting the upper hand, and cut supplies (one way or another) to the rebels if they seem to be winning. Why bother to do anything else ????? In Egypt, I like Krauthammer's analysis: The military, if they win, will produce a big question mark (= 0.00001) But if the Brotherhood wins you get Muslim extremism, Sharia law, etc. (= 0.0) 0.00001 trumps 0.0 /Taro