Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (735475)	8/28/2013 3:59:04 PM
From: longnshort	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1579750

"Besides, the idea that Saddam transferred his weapons to Syria is absurd. If he had any, he would have used them against the invasion forces." and you know this how ?? did wiener tell you ?

To: combjelly who wrote (735475)	8/28/2013 4:21:50 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1579750

>> If he had any, he would have used them against the invasion forces. Oh, you're right. Saddam was, after all, shown to be a fine military strategist and tactician.

To: combjelly who wrote (735475)	8/28/2013 5:13:22 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By Brumar89 Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 1579750

CJ, If he had any, he would have used them against the invasion forces. Saddam has used chemical weapons in the past. So yeah, he did have them. Of course, there was a long period of time between then and the moment Hans Blix showed up at the front door of Saddam's palace. That's plenty of time to ship them elsewhere. Syria? Who knows? Assad is probably doing the same thing with his WMD. Why else would his foreign minister be open to UN inspections, unless they were convinced that they're being framed by the rebels? Tenchusatsu