SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)8/30/2013 12:20:03 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Feds reject anti-Semitism claims at 3 UC campuses
...........................................................................
LISA LEFF, Associated Press, August 28, 2013
sfgate.com

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The federal government has dismissed allegations that three University of California campuses failed to effectively respond to claims of anti-Semitism that arose out of pro-Palestinian events at the schools.

The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights said in letters sent last week to leaders at UC Berkeley, UC Santa Cruz and UC Irvine that the protests, teach-ins, lectures, graffiti and heated confrontations that gave rise to the claims didn't constitute harassment of Jewish students.

In its Aug. 19 letters to the universities, the Education Department said in most cases the activities at issue were acceptable expressions "on matters of public concern directed to the university community" and "not a legally sufficient basis to establish a hostile environment" was interfering with Jewish students' educations.

"In the university environment, exposure to such robust and discordant expressions, even when personally offensive and hurtful, is a circumstance that a reasonable student in higher education may experience," Zachary Pelchat, the leader of the team tasked with investigating the complaints, wrote. "In this context, the events that the complainants described do not constitute actionable harassment."

The complaints were brought under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities such as public universities that receive federal funding.

Hebrew lecturer Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, who filed the complaint dealing with UC Santa Cruz, said Wednesday that she found the government's decision to dismiss all three complaints on the same day would exacerbate the tensions and have a chilling effect on supporters of Israel.

"The message the federal government sends with the closure of these three Title VI complaints, which is to say almost all the complaints of their kind that have been launched in the U.S., is that not only are Jewish students not protected, but anyone who speaks out on their behalf is not protected either."

Rossman-Benjamin said she plans to appeal. The Department of Education has a quasi-judicial board that hears appeals in civil rights cases.

As part of its investigations, which started at Irvine in 2007, Santa Cruz in 2011 and Berkeley in 2012, the department interviewed and surveyed students. Representatives from the Office of Civil Rights also visited the Berkeley campus in March, when a Jewish student group hosted a "Israel Peace and Diversity Week" and opponents of Israel's policies in the West Bank staged a counter-demonstration featuring a mock bus painted with the words "No Palestinians."

The allegations the Education Department investigated stemmed from a variety of events dating back more than a decade.

At Berkeley, they included claims that anti-Jewish comments were made at meetings to discuss a student senate bill calling on the university to divest from companies that support Israel's military in the Palestinian territories. Rossman-Benjamin alleged that officials at Santa Cruz did not respond quickly enough when graffiti depicting swastikas along with the Star of David surfaced on campus and that some of her Santa Cruz colleagues failed to intervene or joined in when students were verbally attacked for defending the Jewish state.

The Irvine complaint chronicled a series of contentious exchanges between Jewish and Muslim students, including a claim by a student wearing a pro-Israel T-shirt to an event hosted by the Muslim Students Association that she was yelled and cursed at. Federal officials concluded, however, that in most cases students sympathetic to the Jewish state were targeted for their political views, not national origin.

The chancellors of the Santa Cruz and Berkeley campuses, George Blumenthal and Nicholas Dirks, issued statements applauded the conclusions the Education Department reached.

"This campus values the free and open expression of ideas, and we diligently safeguard our students' civil rights," Blumenthal said. "We are, therefore, pleased that these allegations have been thoroughly investigated and dismissed."



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"In the university environment, exposure to such robust and discordant expressions, even when personally offensive and hurtful, is a circumstance that a reasonable student in higher education may experience,"

Just don't be a rodeo clown with an Obama mask



Just curious, if this had happened to moslems, would the Feds had come to the same conclusion?




To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)8/30/2013 10:02:55 AM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
The1Stockman
Woody_Nickels

  Respond to of 16547
 
from MSNBC's chris matthews, "no one uses poison gas anymore, even Hitler didn't use it"

Hey moron--- ever hear of Zyklon B?

A
nd this is where libs get their "news."

Matthews statement would have ended the career of any conservative commentator



To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)8/30/2013 9:15:07 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Appeals court says White House visitor logs can be kept from public



To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)8/30/2013 10:18:20 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Rim Fire: Did illegal marijuana growers start the Yosemite blaze?
............................................................................................................................
By Paul Rogers 08/30/2013
progers@mercurynews.com

Investigators searching for answers into what caused the massive wildfire burning in and around Yosemite National Park have made some headway, fire officials said Friday.

Most authorities are mum about the details, but one fire official in Tuolumne County offered a tantalizing clue when he recently told a community meeting that the fire was likely caused by marijuana growers.

"We don't know the exact cause," said Todd McNeal, fire chief in Twain Harte, a town that has been in the path of the flames. But he told a community meeting that it was "highly suspect that there might have been some sort of illicit grove, a marijuana grow type thing."

"We know it's human caused. There was no lightning in the area," said McNeal, a former captain with the Sonora Fire Department who has fought fires for 23 years for the Forest Service, the National Park Service and other agencies in the Sierra Nevada.

His remarks, made on Aug. 23, were recorded and posted on YouTube in a video that has gotten surprisingly little attention.


Officially, authorities were saying little.

"The cause is still under investigation. There has been progress in the case, but we can't share any additional details at this time," said Stanton Florea, a spokesman with the U.S. Forest Service.

The Rim Fire began Sept. 17 in a remote area of Stanislaus National Forest called Jawbone Ridge, far from any paved road. Smoke from the blaze has drifted so far that satellites are measuring it thousands of miles away over Canada and the Great Lakes --and in traces over Europe.

By Friday, the fire had burned 201,894 acres, making it the fifth largest wildfire in California history. It was 32 percent contained; fire officials are estimating full containment on Sept. 20.

Over the past decade, the Forest Service and rural police have reported an increasing number of huge marijuana plantations being found in national forests across California and other states. The operations are run by Mexican drug cartels and are often guarded by armed lookouts, authorities say.

The growers have shot wildlife, rerouted streams and poisoned parks and forests with pesticides. They also have started fires.

In 2009, a huge fire that burned 90,000 acres in the Los Padres National Forest near Santa Barbara was set by a campfire from an illegal marijuana grow,
Forest Service investigators concluded at the time. The Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department said the operation was run by a Mexican drug cartel.

Deputies reported finding 30,000 marijuana plants and an AK-47 assault rifle in a remote canyon near where the wildfire started. They also found piles of garbage, propane tanks and a charred stove.

A few weeks after that incident, the Santa Barbara County sheriff said that the tightening of security around the U.S.-Mexico border had led to the rise in drug gangs deciding to grow marijuana on public lands in California.

"It's made it much more difficult for the cartels to smuggle into the country, particularly marijuana, which is large and bulky," Sheriff Bill Brown said. "It's easier to grow it here."

McNeal, the Twain Harte fire chief, did not return calls on Friday, as 5,000 firefighters continued to battle the flames.

A top political leader in the area said that marijuana growers have been an ongoing problem in Stanislaus National Forest.

"We know that these illegal pot growers are out in our forests, and I think this fire just wiped out a whole bunch of them," said Randy Hanvelt, chairman of the Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors.


"It's a problem in all the Sierra forests," he added. "When we find them, we pull out like 20,000 plants at a time."

Hanvelt said he did not know what leads Forest Service investigators have made in cracking the case. The area where the fire started is roughly 10 miles east of the Yosemite National Park entrance on Highway 120 and 8 miles west of the town of Groveland -- a rugged, steep expanse of dense wilderness.

"It's a tough place to get to," he said. "You don't get there by accident."


In June, deputies pulled out 15,000 marijuana plants from the adjacent forest to the south, Sierra National Forest. The Madera County Sheriff's Department removed four miles of irrigation pipe connected to streams and more than 2,000 pounds of garbage, propane tanks, bedding and food. A month earlier, fire crews battled a 40-acre wildfire in the same area, and authorities said it had been set by marijuana growers tied to Mexican drug cartels.

Also Friday, U.S. government satellites continued to churn out images showing just how far the Rim Fire's impacts are being felt.

Smoke from the blaze drifted at least 2,500 miles, and reached Michigan, Indiana, Ohio and the Great Lakes. The soot particles, picked up by nine weather satellites run by NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, were 10,000 feet or higher in the air, however, and weren't affecting air quality in most places, except areas near the fire, such as Reno and the San Joaquin Valley.

Mark Ruminski, a meteorologist with NOAA's satellite analysis division in College Park, Md., said that European satellites have even detected low levels of soot from the fire over Scandinavia. The particles will disperse and wash out of the atmosphere after it rains, he said.

"Sometimes people will say 'I can smell smoke,' but most of the time if you are a thousand miles away you don't even know it," he said.

credit fubho



To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)8/30/2013 10:51:54 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Military leadership has been subjugated by this so-called president to nothing more than political hacks and yes men.

God help us all.


...................................................................................................................................

Air Force expert on Benghazi


"Hands" Handley is a well-respected USAF fighter pilot. Here is his short resume of accomplishments.


Colonel Phil "Hands" Handley is credited with the highest speed air- to-air gun kill in the history of aerial combat. He flew operationally for all but 11 months of a 26-year career, in aircraft such as the F-86 Sabre, F-15 Eagle, and the C-130A Hercules. Additionally, he flew 275 combat missions during two tours in Southeast Asia in the F- 4D and F-4E. His awards include 21 Air Medals, 3 Distinguished Flying Crosses, and the Silver Star.

Here is what Col. Handley wrote in response to Panetta and Dempsey's claims there was no time to send help to Benghazi .

---------------------------------------

Betrayal in Benghazi


Phil "Hands" Handley Colonel, USAF (Ret.)

The combat code of the US Military is that we don't abandon our dead or wounded on the battlefield. In US Air Force lingo, fighter pilots don't run off and leave their wingmen. If one of our own is shot down, still alive and not yet in enemy captivity, we will either come to get him or die trying.

Among America 's fighting forces, the calm, sure knowledge that such an irrevocable bond exists is priceless. Along with individual faith and personal grit, it is a sacred trust that has often sustained hope in the face of terribly long odds.

The disgraceful abandonment of our Ambassador and those brave ex-SEALs who fought to their deaths to save others in that compound is nothing short of dereliction-of-duty.

Additionally, the patently absurd cover-up scenario that was fabricated in the aftermath was an outright lie in an attempt to shield the President and the Secretary of State from responsibility.

It has been over eight months since the attack on our compound inBenghazi . The White House strategy, with the aid of a "lap dog" press has been to run out the clock before the truth is forthcoming.

The recent testimonies of the three "whistle blowers" have reopened the subject and hopefully will lead to exposure and disgrace of those responsible for this embarrassing debacle. It would appear that the most recent firewall which the Administration is counting on is the contention "that there were simply no military assets that could be brought to bear in time to make a difference" mainly due to the unavailability of tanker support for fighter aircraft.

This is simply BS, regardless how many supposed "experts" the Administration trot out to make such an assertion.

The bottom line is that even if the closest asset capable of response was half-way around the world, you don't just sit on your penguin ass and do nothing.

The fact is that the closest asset was not half-way around the world, but as near as Aviano Air Base , Italy where two squadrons of F-16Cs are based.

Consider the following scenario (all times Benghazi local): When Hicks in Tripoli receives a call at 9:40 PM from Ambassador Stevens informing him "Greg, we are under attack!" (his last words), Hicks immediately notifies all agencies and prepares for the immediate initiation of an existing "Emergency Response Plan."

At AFRICON, General Carter Ham attempts to mount a rescue effort, but is told to "stand down". By 10:30 PM an unarmed drone is overhead the compound and streaming live feed to various "Command and Control Agencies" so everyone watching that feed knew damn well what was going on.

At 11:30 PM Woods, Doherty and five others leave Tripoli, arriving in Benghazi at 1:30 AM on Wednesday morning, where they hold off the attacking mob from the roof of the compound until they are killed by a mortar direct hit at 4:00 AM.

So nothing could have been done, eh? Nonsense. If one assumes that tanker support really "was not available" what about this:

When at 10:00 PM AFRICON alerts the 31st TFW Command Post in Aviano Air Base, Italy of the attack, the Wing Commander orders preparation for the launch of two F-16s and advises the Command Post at NAS Sigonella to prepare for hot pit refueling and quick turn of the jets.

By 11:30 PM, two F-16Cs with drop tanks and each armed with five hundred 20 MM rounds are airborne. Flying at 0.92 mach they will cover the 522 nautical miles directly to NAS Sigonella in 1.08 hours. While in-route, the flight lead is informed of the tactical situation, rules of engagement, and radio frequencies to use.

The jets depart Sigonella at 1:10 AM with full fuel load and cover the 377 nautical miles directly to Benghazi in 0.8 hours, arriving at 1:50 AM which would be 20 minutes after the arrival of Woods, Doherty and their team.

Providing that the two F-16s initial pass over the mob, in full afterburner at 200 feet and 550 knots did not stop the attack in its tracks, a few well placed strafing runs on targets of opportunity would assuredly do the trick.

Were the F-16s fuel state insufficient to return to Sigonelli after jettisoning their external drop tanks, they could easily do so at Tripoli International Airport , only one-half hour away.

As for those hand-wringing naysayers who would worry about IFR clearances, border crossing authority, collateral damage, landing rights, political correctness and dozens of other reasons not to act -- screw them. It is time our "leadership" get its priorities straight and put America 's interests first.

The end result would be that Woods and Doherty would be alive. Dozens in the attacking rabble would be rendezvousing with "72 virgins" and a clear message would have been sent to the next worthless POS terrorist contemplating an attack on Americans that it is not really a good idea to "tug" on Superman's cape.

Of course all this depends upon a Commander In Chief more concerned with saving the lives of those he put in harm's way than getting his crew rested for a campaign fund raising event in Las Vegas the next day. It also depends upon a Secretary of State who actually understood "What difference did it make?", and a Secretary of Defense who was watching the feed from the drone and understood what the attack consisted of instead of making an immediate response that "One of the military tenants is that you don't commit assets until you fully understand the tactical situation."

YGBSM! ( You Gotta Be Shittin' Me)

Ultimately it comes down to the question of who gave that order to stand down? Whoever that coward turns out to be should be exposed, removed from office, and face criminal charges for dereliction of duty. The combat forces of the United States of America deserve leadership that really does "have their back" when the chips are down.

TO AVOID THIS HAPPENING AGAIN, WHOMEVER GAVE THE "STAND DOWN" ORDER NEEDS TO BE EXPOSED!!!!
Report TOU Violation



To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)9/1/2013 2:34:20 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
Hussein Obama puts hit FOOT on the Oval Office desk.




To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)9/2/2013 12:35:40 PM
From: joseffy3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
FJB
longnshort

  Respond to of 16547
 
Liberal Judge Appoints Monitor To Spy On Sheriff Arpaio
...........................................................................................
Godfather Politics ^ | Sept 2, 2013 | Dave Jolly


Snow was the judge that ruled that Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his department violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by racially profiling Hispanics. This wasn’t enough for Obama and Holder, largely because Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse refused to back off from the investigation into Obama’s birth certificate, Social Security Number and Selective Service Registration form, all of which appear to be forgeries.
.
.
.
Late last week, Judge Snow rendered an additional ruling against Arpaio and his department. He ordered that a court appointed monitor watch over all aspects of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department for any instances of racial profiling and discrimination. Snow clarified that the monitor is not allowed to get involved with or interfere with any law enforcement activities of the sheriff’s department. In addition, every member of the sheriff’s department will undergo annual sensitivity training.

(Excerpt) Read more at godfatherpolitics.com ...



To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)9/2/2013 4:37:13 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 

THIS was Obama's Munich moment:





To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (5127)9/3/2013 12:39:59 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Lindsey Graham: A Picture’s Worth 1,000 Words
.....................................................................................
fitsnews.com

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham was the only “Republican” in the entire U.S. Congress to support Barack Obama’s energy tax hike in 2009. Since then he’s been on the leading edge of virtually every “GOP” accommodation of Obama’s agenda – including the massive tax hikes associated with the so-called “fiscal cliff” deal.

Graham also voted to confirm both of Obama’s nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court – who proceeded to voted to uphold the constitutionality of Obama’s socialized medicine bill. Oh, and by way of coming full circle – Graham now opposes any effort to defund Obamacare on the grounds it might lead Obama to shut down the federal government.

Most recently, Graham has been one of Obama’s most aggressive allies in support of unconstitutional domestic spying and misguided global interventionism.

In fact over the Labor Day weekend, Graham and fellow liberal “Republican” warmonger U.S. Sen. John McCain met with Obama to help him plot a strategy for gaining “Republican” support in his quest to launch a limited military strike against Syria (an effort which appears to be encountering some success).

Anyway, here’s a recent Washington, D.C. newspaper cover discussing Graham’s pro-Obama efforts …

(Click to enlarge)



Yup …

There’s your senior U.S. Senator, South Carolina. Aren’t you proud?