SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (230532)8/31/2013 2:24:23 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543149
 
But Clinton never really suffered too much at home for Rwanda. Let's face it, not invading or attacking other countries isn't going to hurt a US president at home, when US interests or people are not being harmed (but screwing up a foreign adventure will hurt). I'd like my country to be out for itself. So whatever we do, I'd like it to be smart, cheap and cost effective. And I don't think it's our job to be the world policeman, or to protect people in other countries from their own governments. If people are unhappy with their governments, they should get rid of them themselves. I don't believe in interfering except where states begin venturing outside their own boundaries to do mischief. It's just so much simpler that way. We, after all, are incarcerating our own citizens at an amazing clip, and we imprison people in appalling conditions- that I'm sure many other countries consider criminal and an affront to human rights. I don't want them using military action on us to change our ways, though. In the end, what happens inside a country is the business of that country.



To: neolib who wrote (230532)8/31/2013 2:24:36 PM
From: Don Hurst  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 543149
 

Re: >>"I suspect it means more gas attacks on Syrian civilians."<<

You are kidding...that is the last thing Syria is going to do at this time unless the rebels decide they want to try it if they are even capable of doing gas attacks.



To: neolib who wrote (230532)8/31/2013 2:28:05 PM
From: Fintas  Respond to of 543149
 
Hard to forget Rawanda. Yet I suspect many have.

The next days and weeks will be interesting.

I'm not so sure many are as concerned re the gas attacks as they should be.

That would suggest the pressure on many to vote yes will not be as great as it could be.

Fintas.