SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (736295)8/31/2013 3:33:17 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
joseffy

  Respond to of 1578342
 
Dude, Who Stole Al Gore's Weather? No Atlantic Hurricanes in August

Al Gore was recently taken to task for exaggerating claims involving the frequency and intensity of hurricanes. The latest weather news makes his misrepresentations look all the more ridiculous.

For the first time since 2002, this year there will be no hurricane activity before September 1.

Reports indicate this is only the 25th time in 161 years that has happened.

The first hurricane of the season has formed on or after September 1 only 25 times in the past 161 years. Since the satellite era began in the mid-1960s, there have only been five years without a hurricane by August 31. The last time a hurricane failed to form before September 1 was in 2002 when Hurricane Gustav formed on September 11.

It would be foolish to make fun of anything involving such potentially dangerous storms and it's also possible we could still see many late developing storms. However, given all the misleading information passed off on the topic by Gore, his allies and a fawning media, hopefully any lack of serious storm activity won't be buried by the media for political reasons.

More here via Bloomberg:

August is about to end without an Atlantic hurricane for the first time since 2002, calling into question predictions of a more active storm season than normal.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (736295)8/31/2013 3:38:43 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
joseffy

  Respond to of 1578342
 

Attack 'effective tomorrow or next week or one month from now'...
Krauthammer: 'Amateur Hour'...

amateur hour...no kidding who didn't know this guy wasn't qualified to be president, hell he wasn't qualified to be a hamburger flipper.

8 years wasted with this bozo and his useless helpers, wonder how much of the treasury they are stealing



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (736295)8/31/2013 4:00:59 PM
From: longnshort3 Recommendations

Recommended By
joseffy
Taro
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1578342
 
Uncovered Muslim Brotherhood Documents Could Put Obama in Prison 8 western



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (736295)8/31/2013 4:35:57 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1578342
 
>> USDA subsidies for farms in Arkansas totaled $10,817,000,000 from 1995 through 2012.

USDA farm subsidies are an even more stupid waste of taxpayer dollars that would not exist were it not for a federal government totally out of control.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (736295)9/1/2013 10:23:01 AM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Jorj X Mckie
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1578342
 


Pardon the Language

by Stephen Green [aka Vodka Pundit]
September 1st, 2013 - 6:44 am

A year into the Syrian Civil War, President Obama made an off-the-cuff remark regarding chemical weapons. He said:

We have been very clear to the Assad regime, but also to other players on the ground, that a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized. That would change my calculus. That would change my equation.

If “whole bunches” of things “being utilized” or maybe just “moving around” changing his “equation” counts as being “very clear,” I’d hate to see what ambiguity would have looked like. But none of that matters, because everybody knew Obama wasn’t being serious, because the very next day his aids leaked that the President might not have really meant the things he’d sort-of said. Obama wanted the appearance of seriousness, I think he thought he appeared to be serious, but there was no actual seriousness to be found anywhere in the President’s general vicinity.

A serious President, after being so very clearly ambiguous, would have gone to the UN. He would have gone to our allies. He would have built up support with the American people. He would have done something other than issuing a promise to maybe look into things after the first known chemical attack, months ago. Instead he waited until a second or third attack, this one big enough to kill nearly 1,500 people, a third of them children. And what did he do? Apparently, Obama called up Britain and France because, hey, that’s what American presidents do. And France’s Hollande said “oui” and Britain’s Cameron said, “I want to come over and play but mom won’t let me.”

Russia and China said ain’t nothin’ is gonna happen at the UN.

Obama says he’s going to go to Congress with this urgent issue, just as soon as they come back from recess in a week. He made this announcement on the Saturday of a holiday weekend when college football began. This followed the announcement that his own Secretary of State, John Kerry, made on the Friday afternoon of a holiday weekend, signaling that the bombing would almost certainly begin within days.

An American President just indicated he was going to war, had the authority to go to war, needed to go to war right away, but that he would have to ask Congress first, and also, “Hey, guys — where’d everybody go?”

The American people yawned, if they witnessed this goat rodeo at all, then went back to beer and football. The rest of the world went wide-eyed and covered their mouths with their hands in embarrassment.

If you’ll pardon my language, I have a simple message for the President of the United States of America.

They can’t follow if you won’t lead, asshole.

Now, I’ve said a lot of nasty things about our last three presidents. A lot of nasty things. But I don’t think I’ve ever been tempted to personally address any of them as “asshole.” Not until today. Not until witnessing the most embarrassing and embarrassingly public performance by a world leader on the world stage. Monica Lewinsky could have been giving Bill Clinton a blowjob right there at the podium during the State of the Union address, in front of all the cameras, and it still wouldn’t have been as air-suckingly horrific as the low-rent Vaudeville act we’ve watched Obama and Kerry put on these last few days. Because in the Clinton-Lewinsky scenario I just described, at least the President is the one getting serviced, instead of dropping trou, bending over, and giving the whole world an invitation to do whatever — because, “You know, whatever. It’s only foreign policy. It’s not like it’s something important, like giving public money away to some buddies of mine who just swear they can build a magic car battery.”

During Dick Nixon’s impeachment hearings, the question was, “What did the President know, and when did he know it?” Turned out, Nixon knew plenty, and knew it all quite early enough to get him driven out of the White House. With Obama the question is, “WTF? I mean WTeffingF? Doesn’t this asshole know anything? And the answer is no, and yet we’re still stuck with this SCoaMF for three and a half more years.

I’m sure the Republic will survive. But I’m not sure we’ll recover unless the next President is Ronald Reagan crossed with Chuck Norris crossed with George Patton crossed with Jesus.

And even then, would the birthers have a field day with that guy.