Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Smith who wrote (52403)	9/1/2013 12:40:17 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

Not at all. If Pelosi believes that we should bomb that is her belief and ethical. What I am saying is that if one feels it is wrong and has the courage to go against their party that is ethics. See the difference. <<Whether he bombs or does not bomb doesn't even seem to matter any more. He has already so mismanaged the situation that no matter what is done, he and our country will be losers. He has again shown himself to be a failed President that should not be in the position he is in.

To: Paul Smith who wrote (52403)	9/1/2013 12:43:50 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

Boy, you must really hate Obama? You wanted me to call him evil when you were sure he was going to bomb without going to congress and now it doesn't matter to you. This is why he had to go to congress, the pubs would have started impeachment hearings if he had; and it is why he will not bomb if congress says no. And many liberals are saying no. The most important ones being wharf and I-lol. So what is your position? Should we bomb or not bomb? Or don't you care now?