Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JeffA who wrote (66635)

9/2/2013 12:05:42 AM

From: calgal

1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

Respond to of 71588

Jewish World Review August 30, 2013/ 24 Elul, 5773

Does GOP Need Solutions for Black Voters?

By David Limbaugh

Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on print
Share on email
More Sharing Services 20

http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | This week, I heard a conservative commentator "admitting" that Republicans don't do enough for black voters. "Why don't conservatives offer solutions?" asked this person.

It bothers me that otherwise-sound conservative thinkers fall into this trap — unwittingly ceding the turf of the debate to their liberal counterparts. The assumption is that unless we offer liberal solutions — catering and pandering specifically to blacks — we have nothing to offer.

Republicans do offer solutions for blacks, just as they offer solutions for all other people. The conservative solution is not to increase government transfer payments to able-bodied people but to pursue policies that will lead to economic growth and opportunity.

Though many liberals would have you believe that efforts to reduce government assistance and dependency programs and to encourage self-sufficiency are heartless, they are in fact more compassionate. Have we learned nothing from a quixotic half-century war on poverty?

At the risk of cliché, it is far more compassionate and humane, as a general proposition, to teach a man to fish than it is to feed him fish. In the long run, it is irresponsible and, yes, cruel to promote policies that result in greater dependency on government for those who don't need to be dependent.

Many "broad-minded" liberals would doubtlessly dispute this assertion, as well, but a cohesive traditional family unit is better for individuals, families and society at large. The breakdown of the traditional family — the absence of fathers from homes — does cause (and has caused) unspeakable damage to Americans, especially black Americans.

Why don't Republicans offer solutions?

Excuse me, but in the '90s the Republican Congress offered welfare reform, one of the purposes of which was to reunite families — to remove government incentives for fathers to abandon their families. It sought to break people's dependency on government, get them back to work and restore their dignity.

Though former President Bill Clinton has often bragged about his accomplishment in passing welfare reform legislation, history records that he had to be dragged kicking and screaming past the veto pen and only signed the bill after rejecting it twice.

There was a broad consensus that welfare reform was successful in achieving some of its goals. Specifically, black illegitimacy and black poverty were reduced after its enactment.

Even if Democrats eventually embraced the reform, their support was short-lived, for President Obama deliberately reversed the salutary effects of the law by gutting its work requirement despite its objective successes.

Why don't Republicans offer solutions?

Excuse me, but for years, conservatives have been shot down in their tireless efforts to establish school choice programs to rescue poor children, especially blacks, from inferior, dangerous inner-city public schools. Though vouchers and choice programs have worked with great success where they've been tried, Democrats have chosen to protect teachers unions at the expense of blacks in opposing them.

Why don't Republicans offer solutions?

Excuse me, but they offer a catalog of policies that would decrease the role of government and re-energize market forces so as to create a climate of economic growth that would expand the pie and increase everyone's opportunity for gainful employment.

Republicans shouldn't pander to black voters by offering the same destructive programs liberal Democrats have enslaved them with for the past 50 years. They should continue to treat them like equals — like human beings made in His image and worth every bit as much as any and all other human beings.

This is not to say the Republicans couldn't use lessons in marketing. Just because they shouldn't pander to blacks and carve out special policies for them in a transparent effort to win their votes doesn't mean they shouldn't learn how to better communicate their message to blacks.

Democrats patronize blacks, treating them as if they aren't capable of getting jobs, of acquiring proper identification to vote and of making up their own minds about which party and candidates to support. The last thing Republicans should do is to board that insulting train.

In the grand scheme of things, though, these issues transcend race. The fundamental dispute underlying the difference between the Democratic approach to race and the Republican one concerns the parties' respective beliefs in the United States Constitution and America's free market system.

Republicans believe in equal opportunity and equal treatment under the law, not in government-imposed equal outcomes. We believe that the greatest good for the greatest number of people, including minorities, will be achieved by ensuring liberty, equality and opportunity for all. History vindicates our position. History repudiates the liberal Democratic position.

After decades upon decades of a barely interrupted avalanche of liberalism, America is in decline, and blacks are hurting relative to the general population. Blacks have done markedly worse during the past five years under President Obama.

With history and the evidence decidedly on their side, Republicans should be able to do a better job of making their case to blacks and all voters. Yes, they have solutions, but it would help if they'd start talking about them as if they believe in them instead of masquerading as Democrat lite.

To: JeffA who wrote (66635)	9/2/2013 10:28:45 AM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 71588

I think you're confusing me with "Jay", who ever that is... but that's OK, you often seem confused. For example: <he has been posturing an threatening and now he cannot put together 3 countries internationally to back his play. Bush had a coalition of over 50.> Of course any fool knows the two are not mutually exclusive, and in fact when little boys (including Bush) cry "Wolf", others stop listening. For me this is perfect, and the fact that Obama loses credibility with "line in sand" is his problem, not the countries. Now he, and future presidents, have learned not to do that... good! This is what SHOULD be happening: We point out the atrocity and alert everyone, put our 2c in as to what should be done and say we will be involved as a team, if you (the neighbors), take the lead. There is no reason Turkey and Saudi Arabia shouldn't take the guy out... I'm SURE there is wide support for a "supporting" role. Libya was a good start, although we should have been further behind the scenes... locals (France, Italy, Britian, Arab countries) who had the big dogs in the fight were front and center. If no one wants to get involved, we did our best.... if Syria continues to do this and the rest of the world sits on its hands it's not our problem. DAK