Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (737206)	9/4/2013 9:00:55 PM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By joseffy Respond to of 1580449

RE:I hypothesized that maybe Assad was desperate enough to do this, that the rebels were actually making significant gains. That is contrary to almost all the news coming out at the time. Assad's forces were supposedly kicking ass at the time of the gas attack. But who really knows...

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (737206)	9/4/2013 9:04:44 PM
From: jlallen	3 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 FJB TopCat Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580449

Both sides have used gas....the question is why it an urgent matter now? Have you noticed how all the burgeoning Odumbo Admin scandals have fallen out of the news cycle.....???

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (737206)	9/5/2013 9:12:11 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580449

Since the rebels already used sarin (a UN investigation team determined that), Assad would have a motive to use it back against them to deter their future re-use of sarin. Why did Hitler not use gas against the Allies? Cause he didn't want it used on his troops. Same principle works with Assad and the rebels.