Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wayners who wrote (87654)	9/9/2013 11:05:42 AM
From: Cage Rattler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Your conclusions can not be backed-up by facts presented in the reference article. You say you are only quoting from that article but, if that be case, can you provide a quote to substantiate your conclusion as written in post #87455, "It was a general info about freemasons and what they do in secret. Do illegal drugs." That conclusion seems to be the implication of an article written to catch the eyes of "Enquiring Minds that need to know" -- but it is invalid. For your information: "Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.[1] In a non sequitur, the conclusion could be either true or false, but the argument is fallacious because there is a disconnection between the premise and the conclusion. All invalid arguments are special cases of non sequitur..." en.wikipedia.org I think we've drifted a bit off the thread's topic.