Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (43023)	9/8/2013 10:50:09 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 86356

koan, your total ignorance of science and the technology that makes it possible mean that you have no ability to know what I know of science or to know what the scientist know. You posted an alleged chart from the latest IPCC report that showed the hockey temp curve. If you think showing that curve shows any who wrote it have a minimal understanding of the true past global temperatures of the Earth, you simply shout your ignorance. The hockey stick temp chart of Mann is so falsified, only the delusional would consider publishing it within any document. If a scientist looked at the PDO and correlated it with past weather and temps. They would not be 90 or 95 percent confident in the power of CO2. That simple association is beyond comprehension for a true believer like you. You can present zero science or data showing how CO2 could drive temperatures. All you have is a speculated radiative forcing property of CO2. Understanding that is the province of physicists, not climate scientist who use some equations in models. The equations are scientifically validated by models ability to predict effects. Just as the Goff-Graph dewpoint equation. You do not have the ability to see the truth of what I just wrote. That is only a small part of your ignorance.