Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (43031)	9/8/2013 12:11:51 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

Just as you are so ignorant of the courses of those who get degrees in science and engineering. you are just or maybe even more ignorant of the true opinions of the world top scientist. You are the fool who ignorant of science takes the sales pitch of whomever that there is a consensus of top scientist who profess AGW is some huge dangerous 95% certainty. You do not understand that. And if your SIL cannot explain that to you, he sure ain't near the top. It's time to leave the Sol system and beam back to Manticore. You would make a perfect Solarian League bureaucrat. OK I may be insulting Solarian League bureaucrats.

To: koan who wrote (43031)	9/8/2013 2:23:24 PM
From: longnshort	4 Recommendations Recommended By Bilow FJB Thomas A Watson TopCat Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

To: koan who wrote (43031)	9/8/2013 5:00:01 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

Hi koan; Re: "I am not trying to win a debate." Ah! That explains why your arguments are so weak. Re: "But going against the vast majority of the worlds top scientists in such an esoteric subject has a very low probability of your being correct. Do you understand that?"; I'm not going against the "vast majority of the world's top scientists". At best for your argument, I'm going against the "vast majority of the world's top climate* scientists*". Scientists as a whole are truthful and careful. Climate scientists, by and large, are neither. You might as well confuse "scientist" with "esp scientists". In the polls on global warming, the alarmists are very careful to weed out the opinions of "scientists" in favor of the opinions of "climate scientists". And many famous scientists have expressed doubt about the fearfulness of the threat of global warming. Why don't you do some research on this side of the question? -- Carl