Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (43036)	9/8/2013 2:18:10 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86356

I would love to see the provonance of the original chart. But I also found this direct quote in the NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate? The upshot is that we will be able to understand climate change well only with the help of global climate models that are able to incorporate all of these mechanisms on an equal footing. We will be able to test our understanding during the era of satellite measurements, when all of these forcing factors can be measured accurately. This report use 3 references to Hanson authored papers. So the NASA experts in camp Hanson state explicitly. {"we will be able to understand climate change well only with the help of global climate models"} And also {"We will be able to test our understanding during the era of satellite measurements, when all of these forcing factors can be measured accurately."} The climate models have demonstrated crap results. And satellite measurements have found NO forcing factors of CO2. So one can state that the NASA experts in camp Hanson have a crap understanding of global climate changes.