SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Magnetics Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: William T. Katz who wrote (10852)12/8/1997 7:07:00 PM
From: Jonathan Bird  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12298
 
BEST CASE SCENARIO BEFORE ONE-TIME CHARGES:

Thanks for that Bill. Let us not forget the APM is expecting to run out of tax credits soon. Of course if things get really bad they may be able to accumulate some more.

Jon Bird



To: William T. Katz who wrote (10852)12/8/1997 7:45:00 PM
From: DJ Levy  Respond to of 12298
 
>Assume no increase in R&D or SGA [probably conservative since they
>are in transition and you would think R&D would be increased].

This is an assumption that could be in error. If you inquire with management, they probably will reveal that cap expenditures have increased signicantly. Didn't someone call Crisman and get a list of important questions run by him?



To: William T. Katz who wrote (10852)12/8/1997 8:11:00 PM
From: Rational  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12298
 
Monday December 8, 6:20 pm Eastern Time

NYSE Unavailables -

NEW YORK, Dec 8 (Reuters) - The New York Stock Exchange said Monday that Hilton Hotels Corp (NYSE:HLT - news),
Applied Magnetics Corp (NYSE:APM - news) and JumboSports Inc (NYSE:JSI - news) were unavailable for after-hours trading for
news.



To: William T. Katz who wrote (10852)12/9/1997 2:21:00 AM
From: William T. Katz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12298
 
THE REVISED COLD HARD NUMBERS:

In my previous analysis (referenced by this post), I came up with a best case scenario (before one-time charges) of:

eps, primary: $0.22 to $0.32 if gross margins range from 26% to 29%.

With a little more time evaluating the numbers, I think that was too optimistic. Here are some reasons to revise these numbers downward.

Gross margins will really be hurt. In the previous qtr, APM had gross margins at 26.7% due in part to poor yields of their MR and 1.7 TFI. Another determing factor of gross margins is volume production. As I read in the June 97 10-Q, the great margins achieved that quarter was due to "higher inductive thin film disk head sales volumes, resulting in economies of scale, coupled with cost controls." With the reduction in orders together with the increasing shift to relatively immature MR lines, APM has neither economies of scale nor a large volume of mature (worked out) lines. Last qtr had high volumes but poor yields. This qtr might see better yields (perhaps offset by relatively more of the poorer yield MR line) but with lower volumes. As a result, I believe gross margins could be below last qtr, but in practically all cases would not be the higher 29% yields.

New gross margin ranges: 24% to 27%.

R&D expenditures are likely to increase with MR transition. As stated in the June 10-Q: "The Company expects that total R&D expenditures in absolute dollars for fiscal 1997 will exceed fiscal 1996 as it increases its efforts on development of MR product technology and production processes." That said, I think R&D is one area where APM might try to better the bottom line. So I'll call R&D flat from last quarter.

Revised BEST CASE estimates:

Net sales for upcoming qtr < $85,980
Gross margins: 24% to 27%
Gross profit < $20,635 to $23,215
R&D + SG&A: $16,900

Net profit < $3,735 to $6,315

revised estimated eps, primary < $0.15 to $0.25


The high-end estimate of the best case situation is still significantly below even the revised earnings estimates for this quarter (~$0.40). I would wager that APM comes in below $0.15 eps because of their "more than 30%" comment.

I have no idea how to interpret their "up to 20%" rebound statement for the qtr ending Mar 98. For those asking questions to Crisman, I'd ask:

1) How are the yields for MR faring compared to last quarter?

2) Is APM having to quickly move away from more mature TFI processes and if so, will this affect gross margins for this quarter?

3) [A better question for our estimates would be:] How are gross margins for this quarter shaping up compared with last quarter? [This would be the most important piece of information for us to figure likely income.]

4) Please clarify the "more than 30%" reduction. Is this closer to 35% than 30%? Are you still operating at high capacity or is the decrease in orders going to effect economies of scale and hence margins?

-Bill