Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Biomaven who wrote (180443)	9/10/2013 9:49:44 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206209

Absolute LOL - you cannot compare Venus with its proximity to the sun. I rest my case on scare mongers. You are a good one for the scare and help to destroy any credibility to your argument. Why do you guys find it necessary to use such tactics? I laugh at you. Do you any T vs t data for Venus? Bob

To: Biomaven who wrote (180443)	9/11/2013 11:37:05 PM
From: Spekulatius	1 Recommendation Recommended By 22jt Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 206209

I don't think that anybody for sure can predict exactly what is going to happen on planet Earth when more and more CO2 and other gases are blown in the atmosphere. However the lack of certainty in my opinion is not a good reason not to take any action. That is because even the chance of a runaway effect of global warning could have very dire consequences and make large parts of planet earth un habitable. Even the risk of such a thing happening is enough reason for me to stop playing with fire and keeping our footprint as small as possible (within reason), simply because a failure to do so could have such dire consequences. I agree with Biomaven that nuclear power is the most credible way out but unfortunately the same crowd that insists on combating climate change tend to be against nuclear power as well.