SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Biomaven who wrote (180509)9/14/2013 1:12:03 PM
From: MIRU1 Recommendation

Recommended By
CommanderCricket

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206191
 
Oregon is hellbent on committing economic suicide. Nothing constructive gets proposed here without multiple gangs of enviro-lunatic lawyers attacking it. Latest insanity is spending $3 million to hire owl hunters to kill the barred owls that have out-competed the precious spotted owl. (I am not making this up) And God forbid anyone would be allowed to export coal from an Oregon port. Oregon shares with Mississippi the distinction of succeeding in doubling the percent of the people on food stamps in the last 5 years.



To: Biomaven who wrote (180509)9/14/2013 5:15:31 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206191
 
>> But what was the date of that report? <<

I don't know, I looked at a number of recent CS Global LNG notes like this one doc.research-and-analytics.csfb.com
and didn't see any mention of Senator Wyden.

In the past Senator Wyden has advocated that DOE go slow on the export approvals as shown
in these stories.

Not so fast
mailtribune.com

In September, when Jordan Cove first announced its intention to pursue exporting, U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden said, "I think it's premature to conclude that the United States now has so much natural gas that it can afford to export it overseas. I think there ought to be a time-out on approving LNG exports until there is a better understanding of how much natural gas there is, whether it can be safely extracted, and what the impact on the U.S. economy would be from LNG exports."

Incoming Senate energy chair stands firm in opposition to expanded LNG exports
By Herman Wang | January 10, 2013 06:04 PM
blogs.platts.com

...But Wyden has held firm to his opposition of expanded LNG exports, saying the Jordan Cove project and others like it could cause natural gas to trade as a global commodity, similar to oil. That would mean US consumers could expect to encounter volatile swings and price shocks for future natural gas supplies, he has said. In a letter to Secretary of Energy Steven Chu on January 10, Wyden urged him to shelve a DOE-commissioned study on LNG exports, conducted by NERA Economic Consulting, which he said vastly underestimates potential growth in domestic gas demand.

“Export applications, which are typically for 20 years or more, and the associated LNG export terminals, will reshape the North American natural gas market for years to come,” Wyden wrote. “The shortcomings of the NERA study are numerous and render this study insufficient for the department to use in any export determination.”

The study, released in December, found such exports would be a boon to the US economy and would not cause any major adverse effects on US household wealth, employment or industrial competitiveness. DOE has said it may use it as the basis for ruling on 20 export permit applications to non-FTA countries beginning in February...

--

However, Senator Wyden also maintains a 90% plus organized labor voting record. In April construction contractors for Jordan Cove signed a project labor agreement pledging to employ union construction workers if construction moves forward. nwlaborpress.org In May his opposition seemed to soften.

Wyden Urges DOE to Update LNG Export Policy
May 21 2013 energy.senate.gov

Washington, D.C. – Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., today emphasized the importance of updating the Department of Energy’s application process for liquefied natural gas exports to reflect the country’s new bounty of natural gas, and to ensure the United States gains the greatest benefit from this strategic national asset.

Wyden, who also chairs the Senate Finance Committee on International Trade and supports expanding U.S. trade opportunities, has called for a natural gas policy that allows exports, but also prioritizes national security and protects against price shocks for domestic consumers.

“The reality is we are dealing from a position of strength with respect to energy,” Wyden said. “Our country should not be wedded to this either/or choice between no exports and no limits on exports. Done right, there ought to be a way to get the trade benefits to exporters and trading partners while maintaining the domestic, economic and energy security benefits to our country.”

---

With his go slow, let's study this some more advice clearly being ignored by the Obama Administration
and with labor agreements in place and near certain approval only months away Wyden has to decide
what he wants to do, persist in a futile attempt to stop export approvals and piss off his traditional labor
allies or tick off the NIMBY's and anti-carbon greens? What are the greens going to do? Vote Republican? Hard hats will cross party lines and vote Republican, remember Reagan Democrats? But the Greens are trapped, they either vote for the Democrat or stay home. Their support can be taken for granted by Dems. It's a simple political calculation.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Senator Wyden attempt to mend fences with the greens by resuming
his calls for no more LNG export port approvals AFTER Jordon Cove is approved.

I don't know why Credit Suissse thinks Wyden can stop Jordon Cove or, in light of the support of Labor, would want to.



To: Biomaven who wrote (180509)11/19/2013 1:55:39 PM
From: Dennis Roth1 Recommendation

Recommended By
evestor

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 206191
 
Latest approval for exporting US LNG a disappointment: Freeport CEO
Washington (Platts)--18Nov2013/407 pm EST/2107 GMT
platts.com

The US Department of Energy's latest conditional approval allowing Freeport LNG to ship more liquefied natural gas from its proposed Texas terminal falls 1 Bcf/d short of the Houston-based company's export plans, creating excess capacity and potentially complicating future expansion, the company's CEO said Monday.

"We're quite disappointed in the order itself," Freeport CEO Michael Smith said in an interview...

...Following Friday's Freeport announcement, there are at least 20 non-FTA export applications in line waiting for DOE approval, but Smith said that likely only one more, Sempra LNG's application to ship 1.7 Bcf/d from its Cameron LNG facility in Louisiana, will likely be approved before the DOE imposes a moratorium on new approvals. DOE will likely wait to study new, year-end data before its next approval...

===

Biomaven, It looks like Jordon Cove will have to wait while DOE does another study.