To: Jamey who wrote (232 ) 12/8/1997 10:31:00 PM From: C. Riley Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2595
The attempts to divert this discussion into Riley bashing does not benefit anyone's understanding of this stock. I am not short this stock as some have suggested nor do I wish the price to fall so that I might buy it "cheap". Instead, unlike the hypsters and cheerleaders who in fact have a vested interest in this stock, I have taken an effort to volunteer some analysis of the stock and share my thoughts. You are under no obligation to read my posts nor believe a word I say. I can't count the number of times someone on this thread has made statements like "this stock is worth $1.50 a share on fundamentals alone" yet provided no backup to support the statement. Why then should there be objection to someone who proposes a counter possibility AND provides his reasoning to back it up? I have read every single posting on this thread, and not one of the pro-AWLT folks have offered an analysis with anywhere the detail and thoroughness that I have attempted to bring forth. Not one. The pro-AWLT folks have made unsubstantiated claims of market manipulation and illegal shorting. I guess that's alright though, huh? If someone who expresses healthy skepticism through analysis is labeled a wannabe savior, what shall we label those who offer only blind, unfounded positive adoration? If anyone's motives are to be questioned, let it be those who stand to profit. I have no reason to hope the company does anything other than succeed, but I am neither in support of nor against this company. How many of the other posters on this thread can say the same? Now, does anyone else have any information or analysis they'd like to share, or must we live on a diet of pure hype? --- Let the greatest part of the news thou hearest be the least part of what thou believest, lest the greater part of what thou believest be the least part of what is true.