Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (41803)	9/18/2013 2:05:01 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 69300

Rational people ought to accommodate intelligent thought that questions Evolutionary Science and considers Scientific differences of opinion. So that was a great ballgame, eh! ;-) Moving on... Is it possible to end war? This is a question that intelligent people have asked since the first Brumstone sharpened a rock and cut off his dick! Clearly, rational people can consider the rational causes of conflict: land, resources, land, resources, and land. And in rationally doing so they can end war, in my opinion. But what if we bring superstitious people into the equation? What if we bring in people who think they are (not only morally superior to others), but who think they are also ELECTED people--by an imaginary Nitwit who enjoys killing things and enjoys sniffing the burning?? Let us consider: Not only are Chosen People Enjoined to recognise their superiority and their freedom from exercising normal human moral constraints--but they are so far removed from the rest of us that they will go to a Paradise while we will be TORTURED FOREVER! HEY...it does not get much better than that for ignorant asses! So we can find Peace on Earth. *But only if Superstitious Idiots are somehow not involved.*

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (41803)	9/18/2013 2:39:23 PM
From: Greg or e	1 Recommendation Recommended By Brumar89 Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 69300

Your spelling mistakes are irrelevant to the accuracy of your assertions just as traffic stats are irrelevant to the truth content of any site whether it be Atheist or Christian, but you're desperate and drowning, so we understand why you cling so tightly to such obviously weak arguments. "What he proposes is not science, thats clinging to the same old theology & myths, while in fact materialist science..." LOL! To the contrary, it's Scientism that isn't "Science". You don't seem bright enough to understand that. "Its not science to say its just impossible or too complex *in his opinion,* all he has is inferrence, belief & the appeal to a select few authorties & his incredulity." You are intentionally misrepresenting his position, but again your obvious desperation is driving that. Here is Meyer in his own words: "Contrary to media reports, Intelligent Design is not a religious-based idea, but instead an evidence-based scientific theory about life’s origins—one that challenges strictly materialistic views of evolution..." "Design is an inference from biological data, not a deduction from religious authority." "Into that dynamic situation in evolution biology in which there is currently no consensus about the cause or mechanism of macro-evolutionary innovation, I propose the theory of Intelligent Design as an explanation for the origin of the novel information necessary to build novel forms of animal life." - See more at: jonathanmerritt.religionnews.com