OBAMA, DEMPSEY SLAP DOWN NEOCONS ON SYRIAN FALSE-FLAG
Sep 18, 2013 7:21AM GMT
Why has the US postponed - perhaps even canceled - its plan to attack Syria?
The mainstream media - led by the neocon Zionists and their allies - are spinning the story as a humiliating disaster for the US and Obama.
The whole neocon choir is chanting the same propaganda talking points:
- By not enforcing his chemical weapons “red line” Obama has squandered prestige and credibility- not just his own, but also that of the presidency and the nation.
- Obama’s refusal to attack Syria is not only a betrayal of the Syrian rebels, but also a betrayal of Israel - the only nation on earth whose leadership and population are united in the desire to see a US attack on Syria.
- If America cannot attack Syria now, in the wake of a shocking story about a huge chemical weapons attack complete with photos of dead children, it may never be able to do so.
For once, the neocons may not be entirely wrong.
Obama, the presidency, and the USA have indeed lost prestige. America’s Syria policy, which lacks consistency and rationality, is indeed a disaster. But bombing Syria for al-Qaeda and its Saudi and Israeli sponsors would not solve the problem. On the contrary, it would be a wild, irrational gamble that could easily escalate into World War III.
Obama’s refusal to bomb Syria is indeed a “betrayal” of Israel, Saudi Arabia, and their al-Qaeda-led Syrian rebel allies. But that betrayal is richly deserved. For it was the Saudi-Israeli “rebels” who first betrayed Obama - by staging the chemical weapons false flag in Ghouta.
It is becoming increasingly clear that the rebels, not Assad, unleashed the chemical weapons. Their intention: force the US to bomb Syria. And Obama and his military chief, General Dempsey, appear to be sending a message to the Israelis: “You will not draw the US into any more Mideast wars with your murderous false flag attacks!”
Accumulating evidence shows that the Israelis and/or Saudis and their rebel proxies were behind the chemical weapons attack in Ghouta. Here are some of the indications that it was the rebels, not the Syrian government, that launched the gas attack:
- Turkish prosecutors have indicted Syrian rebels for seeking chemical weapons. Russia Today reported Sunday: “The prosecutor in the Turkish city of Adana has issued a 132-page indictment, alleging that six men of the al-Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front and Ahrar ash-Sham tried to seek out chemicals with the intent to produce the nerve agent, sarin gas, a number of Turkish publications reported.”
- Two former hostages of the Syria rebels told the European media that they overheard their captors discussing the fact that they - not the Syrian government - were responsible for the chemical attack in Ghouta.
- Other reports have identified the dead children in the widely publicized photos of gas attack victims as Alawites who were kidnapped and presumably murdered by rebel forces.
- Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell’s former chief advisor, says his intelligence sources have informed him that the Ghouta gas attack was an Israeli false flag.
All of these reports confirm what circumstantial evidence and common sense had already suggested: Assad would be unlikely to greet the weapons inspectors arriving in his country with a huge, militarily useless chemical attack on civilians just a few miles from where the inspectors were touching down. On the contrary, the gas attack has all the hallmarks of a classic false flag operation.
Obama and Dempsey almost certainly knew that by refusing to attack Syria immediately after the gas attack, they would be buying time for the truth to surface... which would indefinitely postpone the planned US attack on Syria. Likewise, the President and his military chief almost certainly knew that Congress would be unlikely to approve a wildly unpopular US attack on Syria. And they almost certainly knew that their refusal to go to war would be reviled by the neocons.
In other words, when Obama decided to go to Congress, rather than bombing Syria himself, he was actually deciding not to bomb Syria.
That means that Obama and Dempsey have just delivered a major slap-down to the neocons and their real Commander-in-Chief, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu.
This interpretation is consistent with Obama’s and Dempsey’s continuing refusal to obey Netanyahu’s orders to attack Iran. And it is consistent with Obama’s personal loathing of Netanyahu, which he expressed openly to French President Sarkozy, and underlined by meeting with David Letterman instead of Netanyahu when the Israeli PM came to the United Nations to make a fool of himself by waving around “red line” cartoons.
Obama’s refusal to bomb Syria is reminiscent of JFK’s refusal to bomb Cuba during the Bay of Pigs affair. In both cases, the American President at first played along with the warmongers, and then pulled back.
In 1960, CIA Chief Allan Dulles convinced newly inaugurated President John F. Kennedy to send a band of CIA mercenaries to invade Cuba. Dulles told Kennedy that the CIA landing at the Bay of Pigs would spark an uprising and cause the Cuban people to overthrow Fidel Castro.
JFK approved the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba by a few thousand CIA-backed Cubans. But when the CIA mercenaries landed, Dulles told the President it was time to send in the Air Force... followed by a full-scale US invasion.
The President realized he had been lied to; the CIA landing had been designed to spark a US attack on Cuba, not an uprising of the Cuban people. Kennedy angrily rebuffed Dulles, and left the CIA mercenaries to be captured or killed.
Kennedy became the arch-enemy of the war-mongers... who publicly executed him a few years later.
Today, Obama is following in the footsteps of Kennedy - but he is doing so very cautiously.
Unlike Kennedy, who was saddled with a war-mongering military led by “Operation Northwoods” conspirator Lyman Lemnitzer, Obama has the support of his Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dempsey, who is not eager to sacrifice more American lives for Israel.
Obama made a terrible mistake by drawing a “red line” around the issue of chemical weapons. That mistake was comparable to JFK’s foolish decision to approve the Bay of Pigs invasion.
Obama, like JFK, was must have been very angry when he discovered he had been lied to by the war-mongers. In Obama’s case, the war-mongers alienated the President by staging a ridiculously transparent false-flag operation at Ghouta. Their big lie - that the Syrian government was responsible - would have been obscured by the “fog of war” had Obama followed Netanyahu’s orders to quickly bomb Syria. Instead, Obama decided to hang the perpetrators out to dry - just as Kennedy hung the CIA out to dry after the Bay of Pigs fiasco.
Now the neocon plan for a US war on Syria, followed by war on Iran, is off the table.
The neocons are furious. Their rage is palpable. The foul stench of their unrighteous anger rises like toxic fumes from the American editorial pages they so treasonously dominate.
How will Netanyahu and his neocons respond?
Do not expect them to go gently into that good night.
They may organize another presidential assassination, like JFK’s war-monger enemies did.
Or they may stage a bigger false-flag attack... another 9/11, or worse.
Russian President Putin has warned the world that the Saudi-Israeli “Syrian rebels” are planning to launch a chemical attack on Israel and blame it on Assad. Rumors are circulating that the Israelis may unleash spectacular destruction by bombing US ports or oil and gas storage facilities, and blame it on Syria or Iran. Some in the intelligence community worry that the Israelis are organizing an “Operation Ring of Fire” that would involve the detonation of nuclear weapons on US soil.
At this moment of heightened tension and Orwellian deceit, one thing is clear: Patriotic forces in the US, and people of goodwill around the world, should be on their guard against another big 9/11-style neocon false-flag attack.
|
