Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (740467)	9/19/2013 12:56:56 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1572921

lol Clueless again....

To: tejek who wrote (740467)	9/19/2013 1:19:43 PM
From: jlallen	4 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 Jorj X Mckie one_less TideGlider Respond to of 1572921

Re Vitter: There is no comparison even if Clinton was an adulterer. Not even close. You are correct Ted!!! What Clinton did was much worse....he did it in the people's house with a young and impressionable intern whose character he then tried to assassinate, lied to American people about it....lied under oath about it...resulting in a major expenditure of the US Treasury getting to the truth, etc... I applaud you ted for realizing how much worse what BJ Bill did is!!

To: tejek who wrote (740467)	9/19/2013 1:22:24 PM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1572921

Gennifer Flowers on Bill Clinton: ‘He said Hillary had eaten more pu–y than he had’ Posted by Jammie on Sep 19, 2013 at 8:13 am She’s baaaack! Over two decades after she rose to fame, Bill Clinton’s former girlfriend re-emerges. Safe to say you won’t be reading any of this in the American press. Clinton, now 67, also shared a lot of intimacies regarding his marriage to Hillary. They left Gennifer in no doubt that the union is far from ‘traditional.’ She said: ‘What they have is very strong. ‘It obviously worked for them but I’ve never considered theirs a traditional marriage.’ When rumours surfaced recently of an affair between Hillary Clinton and her transition office chief, Huma Abedin, 37, Gennifer was not surprised. The rumours concerning Huma, wife of disgraced former Mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner, 49, emerged as she stood by her husband in the wake of his recent ‘sexting’ scandal. Revelations that he had sent intimate pictures of himself and steamy messages to 23-year-old Sydney Leathers – a girl he had only ever ‘met’ online – finally did for his New York Mayoral campaign last week. The scandal broke almost exactly a year after the shamed congressman suffered a public mauling for the same behaviour. Then, as recently, his wife Huma Abedin stood by him. This time round Huma’s loyalty raised eyebrows and questions over why a woman of such accomplishment would stick by a man so apparently incapable of change. Gennifer said: ‘I don’t know Huma or the Weiners. I just know what Bill told me and that was that he was aware that Hillary was bisexual and he didn’t care. He should know. ‘He said Hillary had eaten more pussy than he had.’ Yet however much their roles as mistress and wife cast Gennifer and Hillary Clinton as natural rivals Gennifer claimed to feel a sense of solidarity with Hillary, 65, and would support Hillary’s candidacy for President. jammiewf.com

To: tejek who wrote (740467)	9/19/2013 3:53:58 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 1572921

This list probably needs some work. Top Ten people the Clintons would love to see gone before the 2016 campain: 10. Jennifer Flowers 9. Monica Lewinski 8. Antony Weiner and Huma 7. Vince Foster - oops 6. Jerry Zeifman 5. Mary Mahoney – oops 4. Juanita Broaddrick 3. Kathleen Willey 2. Gennifer Flowers 1. Justin Beiber and special mention for the movie "Primary Colors"

To: tejek who wrote (740467)	9/19/2013 4:07:29 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB joseffy Respond to of 1572921

Ahead of the soon to be released UN IPCC report, much of which has been leaked and destroyed already, and of which Nature stated that were “out of date by the time they hit the street”, a new peer-reviewed report has been released that thrashes the Warmists and their Blamestorming of Mankind for releasing GHGs. The report is strong enough that Warmists immediately trotted out their “ anti- science” meme without reading it. They just know the report is a danger to their cult ( Breitbart) The report, which cites thousands of peer-reviewed articles the United Nations-sponsored panel on climate change ignored, also found that “no empirical evidence exists to substantiate the claim that 2°C of warming presents a threat to planetary ecologies or environments” and no convincing case can be made that “a warming will be more economically costly than an equivalent cooling.” The U.N.’s panel is scheduled to release its next report next month. The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, or NIPCC, which produced the report, is described as “an international panel of scientists and scholars who came together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change.” Unlike the “United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is government-sponsored, politically motivated, and predisposed to believing that climate change is a problem in need of a U.N. solution,” NIPCC “has no formal attachment to or sponsorship from any government or governmental agency” and is “wholly independent of political pressures and influences and therefore is not predisposed to produce politically motivated conclusions or policy recommendations.” The report blows away the Warmist hysteria regarding sea rise, temperature rise, melting glaciers, “extreme” weather, the Arctic, and every other bit of doom and gloom. [iframe width="300" height="250" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowtransparency="true" scrolling="no" id="aswift_0" name="aswift_0" style="left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px;"][/iframe] “We conclude no unambiguous evidence exists for adverse changes to the global environment caused by human-related CO2 emissions,” the authors write. “In particular, the cryosphere is not melting at an enhanced rate; sea-level rise is not accelerating; no systematic changes have been documented in evaporation or rainfall or in the magnitude or intensity of extreme meteorological events; and an increased release of methane into the atmosphere from permafrost or sub-seabed gas hydrates is unlikely.” I’d highly recommend reading at least the Summary For Policymakers. The study focuses on actual observable data, rather than computer models, micro-reconstructions, and “normalized” data. Nor does it completely dismiss what Mankind does, but notes that our works are miniscule in comparison to natural variability. *Note: the attached graphic is not from the report, but one that has been out that highlights the difference between the Warmist computer models and real world observations.