Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Trading Cabana -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (6220)	9/21/2013 11:24:55 PM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6370

Time to live in the present Kevin. nanomarkets.net ND

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (6220)	9/27/2013 1:34:40 PM
From: deeno	Respond to of 6370

God, she is entertaining. But in order to get the volume up she needs to incite something good or bad it doesn't matter. I think its dead issue here, no one is going to re pick this again, its all a little tired. Do wish Bill would have picked up the gauntlet, hope he is ok.

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (6220)

9/29/2013 3:12:59 AM

From: N. Dixon

Respond to of 6370

Kevin wrote:

Bill first came public on REFR on SI in June 2001, with REFR trading in the mid-20s. His history with the stock prior to then is not known, though Dixon and others enjoy perpetuating the unsupported story that Bill got bought in at the very stop at the height of the dot-com bubble in March 2000 at $40 a share.

Message 5907090

To: Michael who wrote (3331)	10/4/1998 2:08:00 AM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) of 4634

Very strong sell/short-sell recommendation: REFR I wasn't going to open any new short positions over the next few weeks. but this is so compelling and so grossly overvalued, that I can't let the opportunity go. Note that CEO Robert Saxe was a seller of stock (at lower prices) 2 months before the company announced a dubious buyback in August. Amusing side note: Little surprise that web sites for fraudulent or weak companies many times seem to over emphasize information about the stock, but I have seldom seen something like this: on the Research Frontiers web site there's a section named "Links to Other Internet Sites About Research Frontiers". Nearly every link is to a stock chat or investment related site. refr-spd.com Target price: < 1

To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (6220)	9/29/2013 3:44:21 AM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6370

From Yahoo REFR board: Apparently the SHORT position began in October, 1998, when WEXLER issued this recommendation (seen in the post I'm responding to. He says he is shorting at $8.00 a share in October 1998. The stock didn't hit $8.00 until December 1998. From December 1998 the stock did not go below $8.00 except for March and April 1999 until July 2002. That's almost FOUR YEARS of being underwater on his huge short position. I first sent him a polite message in 1998 informing him that his information was incorrect. It was at that time I read the Yahoo REFR board and was immediately attack on both Silicon Investors and Yahoo by some of the same names that are here today. THEY NEVER MADE A PROFIT!!!!!! And now they never will. Adios Manuel and all your flunkies. KJpod's post tried to make it appear the Wexler didn't short REFR until June 2001. Why would kjpod need to lie about this? Does he really care when Wexler shorted unless..... and Pocci.....said on this board he made a $5,000 short purchase and made money. He posted that over a decade ago and STILL posts on this board??????? I could care less if there is a short squeeze or if the chart looks good or bad. But the CHART is the ONLY thing that short sellers can try and get people to look at. They can short shares, hit the stock at the close, walk it down a dime or two. But they CAN'T cover!!! I LOVE IT!!! ND