SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (740950)9/22/2013 1:33:52 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576323
 
>> To me, it means every full-time working person should be compensated enough to provide himself with a basic living.

To me, every full-time employed person should be compensated what he is worth given the market for his skills.

Otherwise, if you have some idiot who got a masters in Gender Studies, that person has no chance of getting a job in his or her field. Because the skills are essential worthless. Why not give this person an opportunity to fix his/her own mistake, rather than committing to a life in poverty?



To: bentway who wrote (740950)9/23/2013 1:43:29 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576323
 
Bentway,
To me, it means every full-time working person should be compensated enough to provide himself with a basic living. To pay rent, buy food, have health insurance.
So your definition of "social justice" only applies to those who have full-time jobs? What about those who don't? Would you support policies that would increase unemployment just to meet your definition?

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News