SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dino's Bar & Grill -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)2/21/2015 7:37:21 PM
From: Goose94Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 203026
 
Skeena Resources (SKE-V) has serious geologist talent to find 1 million oz of gold within a year

Skena Resources is one of a number junior gold companies in Canada, but one with a secret weapon.

Its Chairman, Ron Netolitzky, happens to be one of the foremost geologists in the world, especially so in the Golden Triangle of northwest British Columbia. Mr. Netolitzky is one of the primary developers behind the Snip Mine and Eskay Creek mines. For these achievements, among many others, Mr. Netolitzky received the Prospector of the Year award from the PDAC, and Developer of the Year award from the BC & Yukon Chamber of Mines. Add to the list Netolitzky’s induction into the Canadian Mining Hall of Fame just a few weeks ago.

Not only is Mr. Netolitzky the company’s Chairman, but he’s also the second largest shareholder, having invested C$2 million of hard cash over the past few years. Make no mistake, with Netolitzky as Chairman, Skeena Resources is as well placed to find additional resources suitable for an economically viable mine as any junior in Canada.

Skeena Resources is lucky to have a strong team around Netolitzky, including Rupert Allan B. Sc., P. Geol., Vice-President, Exploration & Director, Walter Coles, Jr., President & CEO, Wendy T. Chan, B. Sc., MBA and Michael Cathro, M. Sc.,P. Geo. Skeena therefore has not one, but three very accomplished geologists on board, virtually unheard of for a company of this size.

The Company’s Spectrum project already has an historical, non NI 43-101 compliant, resource of high grade (12.3g/t) material containing an estimated 243,600 ounces of gold. In addition, Skeena has an extensive and valuable database of historic data including geological mapping, geochemical sampling, trenching and more than 100 diamond drill holes (>12,000 m). With a highly experienced team and armed with ample historical data, Skeena hopes to delineate 1 million ounces of NI 43-101 compliant Indicated & Inferred gold resources within 12 months and subsequently up to 2-3 million ounces. A key takeaway is the results of the company’s first 9 drill holes, drilled in 2014, which are discussed below.

The following interview of Mr. Netolitzky took place by phone and email between January 30th and February 2nd. I, Peter Epstein, interviewed Mr. Netolitzky and I own shares in the company that I paid for myself. I have no prior or existing business relationship with Skeena or any company named in this interview. Skeena is a highly speculative investment opportunity. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult with their own investment advisors.

Mr. Netolitzky, thank you for taking the time with me for this interview, can we please start with a description of Skeena Resources?

Skeena Resources is most focused on advancing its Spectrum gold & copper exploration property located in the, “Golden Triangle” in northwest British Columbia. Our 3,580 hectare property is approximately 37 km west of Imperial Metals’ Red Chris mine and 16 km west-northwest of the NGEx/Teck GJ deposit.
The Spectrum resource appears to be a high-grade deposit that has extensive historical data, including geological mapping, geochemical sampling, trenching, more than 100 diamond drill holes (>12,000 m), and one small underground adit (278m of drift and crosscuts). The majority of this valuable data dates back to Columbia Gold Mines work from 1990-1992. At the time, an ‘inferred’ non NI 43-101 compliant resource of 614,000 tonnes grading 12.3 g/t Au containing 243,600 oz. was estimated to a projected depth of approximately 150 meters. Given our recent successful drill campaign, and ample historical data, we hope to establish a NI 43-101 resource of 1 million ounces of gold within the next 12 months.

Skeena has put out two press releases regarding drill results on a total of 9 holes, were the results as good as hoped for?

We are very pleased with the results of our 9 hole drill campaign last year. Highlights can be found in the two press releases, first 5 holes last 4 holes [NOTE: For convenience, highlights from the two press releases are reprinted here] 23.84 g/t over 6.5 m, including 40.43 g/t over 3.5 m in 14-SP-003; 10.63 g/t over 27.0 m, including 66.00 g/t over 2.0 m and 20.4 g/t over 2.0 m, 9.2 g/t over 2.0 m; 8.0 g/t over 2.0 m; and 22.7 g/t over 2.0 m in 14-SP-004; 18.60 g/t over 2.0 m, 3.19 g/t over 4.0 m, 7.32 g/t over 2.0 m, and 6.88 g/t over 2.0 m in 14-SP-005; 43.80 g/t over 2.0 m in 14-SP-006; 9.50 g/t over 2.0m in 14-SP-007; 4.58 g/t over 9.0 m in 14-SP-008; 13.70 g/t over 4.0 m and 254.50 g/t over 2.0 m in hole 14-SP-009. Importantly, this last intercept represents the deepest intersection of significant mineralization obtained to date (from 285 m to 287 m) and the deposit remains open on strike and at depth. Intercepts averaged 50 m beneath historic intersections, and exhibited excellent vertical continuity, suggesting high-grade mineralization may extend to significant depths.

Why do you think that you might be successful in finding an economic deposit in a basin that’s been actively explored for decades?

That’s an excellent question. The simple answer is that our 3,580 hectare property hasn’t been systematically explored, (except directly on the Central Zone), especially using modern techniques. The property was inactive for 22 years due to government issued right-of way restrictions, recently resolved, allowing the project to move forward. Further, the vendor of the property to Skeena was difficult to deal with. I spent years trying to cut a deal with him before he relented. This opportunity is in my sweet spot, a high-grade zone(s) occurring within a broader halo of low-grade porphyry-style Au-Cu mineralization about 50 m wide and about 600 m strike length. The kind of high-grade, low cap-ex prospect that, if it reaches 1.0 million ounces with good continuity, will very likely become a mine.

Please tell us about the East Creek Zone and its potential importance?

The East Creek Zone, some 1.5 kilometers further to the north of the Central Zone, is a north-trending, 5 m wide silicified zone with gold, pyrite, arsenopyrite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite, traced at surface for a 600 m strike length. A trench sample yielded 58.4 g/t Au over 2.6 m. The East Creek Zone has only been tested with 3 drill holes to date. Two of those drill holes yielded 1 to 2 g/t over less than 2 m, while the third hole yielded 34.45 g/t over 2.6 m. Apart from a single drill hole to the north of the Central Zone Fault, most of the intervening 1.5 km section between the Central and East Creek Zones has not been drill tested and provides an attractive exploration target. If we find continuity between the Central Zone and the East Creek Zone, we could have a very significant deposit with multiple millions of ounces.

Can we get a snapshot of your capital structure? Is there any debt?

As of February 2nd, Skeena has 163 million shares outstanding [89,102,207 shares are subject to Exchange escrow, 360,000 options are escrowed, and 180,000 warrants are escrowed]. Additionally, 80,000,000 of the escrowed shares are further subject to a Pooling Agreement, managed by Mr. Netolitzky, Chairman of Skeena], plus approximate 42 million warrants at $0.10 (essentially at-the-money) and 16 million at-the-money $0.10 stock options. Fully diluted, including at-the-money shares = 221 million. Currently we have no debt. We will probably raise $3-$4 million for the 2015 drilling and for general corporate purposes.

After raising new capital, how long will that fund the company for?

This important capital raise will largely fund us for 2015 and into 2016. Interest in the project has been high. We raised $3 million in Q4 of 2014, which in this particularly inhospitable financing environment is a strong vote of confidence in the technical merit of the Spectrum project and the strong management team. Frankly, the drill results from our first 9 holes were better than we expected. As such, we are optimistic that we will continue to be able to raise capital to advance this very rare high grade gold project. Nevertheless, we plan on maintaining at least $1.0 million of cash on our balance sheet to withstand market uncertainties.

Do you have contact with any First Nations groups, if so, how are your relations with them?

An Archaeological Impact Assessment was undertaken on the in September, 2012 in conjunction with Rescan and a JV company of the Tahltan First Nation, without any significant archaeological issues being uncovered. Skeena looks forward to working with the Tahltan First Nation and other local stakeholders in order to advance a profitable, financially stable, project that the Company hopes will create value for all stakeholders and lasting economic and social benefits for the region.

Please describe in what ways Skeena’s property is like and is different from other Golden Triangle operating mines and/or exploration projects.

The property contains more than 10 different showings of high-grade sulphide-gold mineralization, spatially associated with steeply-dipping fracture zones contained within a broad area. This is the same type of geological setting as many of the major copper-gold deposits in the Golden Triangle area of northwest British Columbia except that Spectrum has demonstrated much higher gold grades.

Skeena’s corporate presentation says that your property is near critical infrastructure and resources, please explain.

First and foremost we have excellent access to roads [paved Highway No. 37] and power [the new hydro line into the Red Chris Mine], each built or upgraded in the past decade. Furthermore, an experienced labor force is available in the region. The port of Stewart is also available to us. We’re not shipping a bulk commodity like coal, so the overall logistics aren’t particularly onerous.

What’s Skeena’s exit plan, will you go into production or advance the Spectrum property enough to try to sell it?

We strongly believe that a great deal of the upside in a junior exploration company comes from discoveries, followed by resource reports, followed by infill drilling to better delineate the resource, followed by building a detailed model of what might be there, followed by more drilling and modeling to compile a Preliminary Economic Assessment, “PEA.” At that stage, my experience has been that suitors start to take a serious look sometime after 1.0 million ounces have been defined in a NI-43-101 compliant resource and/or after the subsequent PEA. If Skeena has what I think it does, namely high-grade gold with relatively low cap-ex and operating costs, then it will be an attractive takeover target.

By Peter Epstein



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)2/25/2015 2:28:40 PM
From: Goose94Respond to of 203026
 
Here’s why there are 600 zombie companies on the TSX/TSX-V ceo.ca



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/2/2015 12:03:48 PM
From: Goose94Respond to of 203026
 
John Kaiser - $3 Billion In Junior Companies Working Capital To Vanish

While there is still hope within the junior resource sector, John Kaiser, founder of Kaiser Research, isn’t painting a pretty picture for some companies.Speaking at a keynote program at the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada’s 83rd convention in Toronto, Canada, Kaiser outlined how badly the junior resource sector is hurting.

He said, “717 companies have negative working capital, 291 have between $0 and $500,000, 554 still have between $500,000 and $20 million – those are the ones that are most likely to survive.”

“How bad is this situation? The companies that have negative working capital are trading below 30 cents, totaling almost $3 billion to service providers, to the executives’ salaries – this money will never be paid back in cash,” he said. “It will be settled for paper, which will then be rolled back and then it is just going to vanish. This is a huge hit to the system right now,” he added.

Kaiser pointed out the change within the sector, noting that many junior companies are now taking their discoveries further down the pipeline.

“An important thing that many people do not understand is that in the last decade, the anti-resource junior space [with] its professionalism, is the level of technical work that they did. It is no longer a story of generating a target, poking holes at it and doing a happy dance when they hit something, and then a major comes in, farms in or takes it up,” he said.

“Now the juniors are taking these things all the way through to feasibility.”

In turn, this has now affected the way potential investors look at investing in a junior resource company. It’s already difficult to find a proper investment, he said, and now expectations have been raised, meaning juniors will need more capital to advance their projects.

“The audience out there, their expectations are now substantial and all these pretend companies that the brokerage industry polluted the system within the past decade, they are simply just going to fade away,” he said.



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/2/2015 10:06:06 PM
From: Goose94Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 203026
 
John Kaiser presented at the PDAC2015 conference in Toronto this morning. He was as grim as ever, pointing out that there are now 717 juniors (of the 1,560 he follows) with working capital positions below $0. He still predicts that these juniors will disappear, as he first foresaw on Dec. 6, 2012, when he published an article entitled, "Bracing for the Extinction of 500 Juniors or an entire institution?" Today, he has only 15 buy recommendations, plus a few dozen companies on his bottom-fish watch list. Looking at his buys, there are five in the gold sector. David Palmer Probe Mines Ltd. (PRB: $4.79) is probably the most successful. It has $37-million in working capital and just attracted a $526-million takeover bid from Goldcorp. Then there are Randy Reifel's Chesapeake Gold Corp. (CKG: $2.25), which has $32-million in working capital for its Metates gold project in Mexico, Stephen Quin's Midas Gold Inc. (MAX: $0.485), which has $8.6-million for its Stibnite project in Idaho, and Donald Robinson's Eastmain Resources Inc. (ER: $0.30), which has $6.5-million for its Clearwater project in Quebec. Mr. Kaiser's most-speculative gold pick is John and Gordon Leask's Highway 50 Gold Corp. (HWY), which has $1.8-million and some gold properties in Nevada.

Message 29965513



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/3/2015 11:17:17 AM
From: Goose94Respond to of 203026
 
Chairman Rick Rule defines capitulation as it relates to resource investing and provides his opinion as to what’s wrong with the industry today. He also explains why he likes the prospect generator model and outlines the mistakes people make when speculating in this sector. smallcappower.com



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/3/2015 3:08:17 PM
From: Goose94Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 203026
 
Why Brent Cook Is Smiling kitco.com



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/4/2015 11:32:52 AM
From: Goose94Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 203026
 
John Kaiser on BNN.ca @ 1140ET



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/5/2015 11:59:49 AM
From: Goose94Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 203026
 
Does The Fed Want A Weaker Dollar? - Adrian Day kitco.com



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/18/2015 2:26:32 PM
From: Goose94Respond to of 203026
 
You're missing action on Gold and Gold stocks for being a baby.



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/19/2015 12:32:02 PM
From: Goose94Respond to of 203026
 
John Kaiser on retail investors, systematic flaws Retail investors, historically the “life blood” of the junior sector, are largely gone from the picture, but need to return for the sector to survive the current downturn, says John Kaiser.



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/19/2015 12:39:26 PM
From: Goose94Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 203026
 
(Video) Zombie Companies quote from John Kaiser. Mickey Fulp's musings on juniors, miners, and gold bnn.ca



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/19/2015 9:33:56 PM
From: Goose94Respond to of 203026
 
It's about time you grew some balls. By the way Stateside I had your thread unsubjectmarked month ago, Rocket PM me about your Tit Fit



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)3/22/2015 10:47:41 AM
From: Goose94Respond to of 203026
 
(video) John Kaiser - Mass junior miner bankruptcies are coming youtube.com



To: statesidereport who wrote (2762)4/11/2015 12:30:56 PM
From: Goose94Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 203026
 
‘Walking dead’ on the TSX Venture Exchange: How are ‘zombie’ companies surviving?

Management at the TSX Venture Exchange and "Stateside" would probably appreciate it if Tony Simon just shut his mouth for a while.
As the co-founder of the Venture Capital Markets Association, Mr. Simon is an unlikely torchbearer for the theory that Canada’s market for junior resource stocks is broken and the Venture Exchange is part of the problem. But he has assumed that role with gusto in the past few weeks as his thoughts have reached an increasing number of ears. It is hard to imagine that anyone else is causing more headaches for the Venture Exchange these days.

Mr. Simon, for his part, thinks he is just stating the obvious.

“This is not something that’s an unknown problem,” the Vancouver-based entrepreneur said.

The Venture management team has fired back, completely denying his claims that they are not doing their jobs properly.

However one feels about the debate, all would agree that Mr. Simon’s research paints a frightening portrait of Canada’s junior exploration sector. It raises questions about how hundreds of tiny resource companies can continue to exist. Sources said that auditors are offering these companies cut-rate fees to maintain their viability.

The controversy started in February, when Mr. Simon published research suggesting there are about 600 “zombie” resource companies on the TSX Venture Exchange that are not meeting listing requirements and should be de-listed. His report has spread around, even getting picked up by Zero Hedge, the influential U.S. financial blog.

The big numbers are grim: by Mr. Simon’s calculation, these “zombies” have combined negative working capital of greater than $2 billion. Raising money has become impossible for many of these junior firms as market conditions have deteriorated over the past few years. Now they are just “walking dead” companies with no serious prospects that pose a threat to investors looking at the sector, he said.

So why are they still around? Mr. Simon noted that TMX Group Inc. is a profitable corporation that relies on listing fees for revenue. He believes the exchange is failing to enforce its own rules, and also blames auditors and securities regulators for not doing enough to crack down on these companies and protect investors.

There are plenty of others who believe the Venture should purge these weaker firms.

“It tarnishes the viability of the or changing our practices. Which is totally without any basis, and in fact it’s absurd,” he said.

A lot of the auditors have given them a lot of slack

“Our continuing listing standards have been applied the same way as long as anybody here can remember in at least 10 years.”

For example, on the issue of negative working capital, Mr. McCoach noted the rules give the exchange some discretion to keep companies listed if their capital position is weak because of seasonal or temporary conditions. And he said working capital is not necessarily the best tool to judge these companies, since the nature of mineral exploration is that you spend your money on drilling and then go raise more of it (if you can).

Mr. McCoach said 27 of Mr. Simon’s 600 companies were previously bounced to the NEX board, which is for Venture companies with little-to-no corporate activity (Bluenose Gold is one of those). The Venture Exchange then took a sample of 135 of the other weakest companies on Mr. Simon’s list, and determined that 30 may not be meeting listing requirements. “Extrapolating that out, we would end up with a number far less ,” Mr. McCoach said.

For the past few years, numerous experts have predicted there will be a purging of these companies. They are seen by some as a relic of the mining bull market from last decade that no longer have a reason to exist. But despite their struggles to raise capital, they have shown an ability to hang in, and Mr. McCoach thinks the vast majority of them will continue to do so.

The question becomes: How are they doing that? Auditing fees alone can cost upwards of $25,000 a year for a small junior mining company, experts said, while listing fees are a minimum of $5,000 to $6,000. And that does not even account for legal fees and transfer agent fees.

By law, an auditor cannot start a new audit for a company until it has been paid for the prior one. Companies with minimal cash and negative working capital should not be able to pay that money. Company insiders won’t foot the bills forever.

But sources said some auditors are offering very low rates to keep these companies from folding — in some cases less than $10,000. One source said he knew of a case in which an auditor settled up with a company at a lower-than-expected-rate, just to ensure it got paid quickly.

“A lot of the auditors have given them a lot of slack,” said Mr. Sheriff.

The miners themselves are always trying to find ways to ease the burden. Tony Drescher, an entrepreneur involved in many small mining companies (including Xiana), said he does as much of the administrative work as possible in-house to control fees. “It would be very difficult if we had to contract this stuff out,” he said, adding companies are always finding creative ways to lighten their fee load.

But insiders wonder how long the survival can last. Junior exploration companies have, for the most part, been in a bear market since 2007. They have managed to defy the doubters and keep the lights on year after year as they hope and pray for better market conditions. It is not a scenario that can go on indefinitely. However one feels about the listing debate, at some point it may make more sense for a lot of companies to just die than to be part of Tony Simon’s Walking Dead.