To: LindyBill who wrote (542027 ) 9/24/2013 1:45:29 AM From: Maurice Winn 2 RecommendationsRecommended By Joe Btfsplk prometheus1976
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794009 If being a Negro means a particular political outcome, then it would be a good idea to look at Negro countries to see what that racial definition will produce: <“America is a shape-shifter, and based on who’s here, in what numbers and at what time, determines the political outcomes,” she said. Blacks should cooperate with Latinos, she said, adding “we all have skin in the game, literally.” The racial appeal was echoed by William Spriggs, chief economist at the AFL-CIO. “If we are going to be the new majority, we’re going to have to start acting like the new majority and start setting the new rules,” he said > There are plenty of Negro countries to consider to see what they want to produce. Maybe they like Zimbabwe but Nigeria or Sierra Leone might be the style they prefer. Perhaps Kenya where plenty of Obama lookalikes are living - Trayvon was like an Obama son so perhaps Trayvon's political style would suit them. They wouldn't want capitalism, so that would be out. It will be interesting to see just what sort of political outcome they'd want. South Africa has very high levels of violence and crime, so that might be their preference, but the $trillion note to buy bread in Zimbabwe is probably the winner. Carnage as in Rwanda would be fun too though. Decisions decisions. What would they prefer? Are there any areas of the USA run by American Negroes at present? Those might show what the whole country would be like if they had broader political defining power. Rumour has it such areas are not Utopian. Euros don't vote the same way simply because they are melanin-deficient. It's a puzzle why the melanin-rich think they should vote the same way as each other. Mqurice