Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Caprius(CAPR), Breast MRI(former ANMR/MAMO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sean Reilly who wrote (2284)	12/9/1997 3:37:00 AM
From: luis a. garcia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2615

but Sean your are right about a lot of these things.. Jack is hitting some major milestones but he is cautios about overexposing the product. I think he prefers to quietly develop oportunities. Recently he added a couple of marketeers to help him develop customers etc. RF's bit was to cut a video of the machine and they accomplished that. I don't know if they are approved for general advertisement... ? . Maybe not. If they had a war chest they would be beating those drums. From what I gather RSNA was better than ever for them in terms of generating interest and prospects.. One thing which corroborates what I have already said here is they found the profesionals more savy about the mri option and more interested than ever.. why do you think other outfits keep touting things they don't even have.. Mammography MRI as an adjunct and a helper to meet FDA quality standards is happening... You let this go to pennies again and barring any other unforseen circumstances I will load up... maybe double up. Just the same I would not like to see that happen.. keep a positive thought luis

To: Sean Reilly who wrote (2284)	12/9/1997 8:59:00 AM
From: Roland Chen	Respond to of 2615

Sean, You are absolutely right. "WHAT THE HELL ARE THEY WAITING FOR?" The officail Web site cost only few hundred dollars to maintain. From all these posts, I understand that we all have confidence on Aurora, but not on the way Jack doing the business (exposure, exposure,exposure,--------). My question is "Do we need a new CEO ?" Regards Roland geocities.com (CAPR dorp below $1, no more Caprius on my web page, sorry)

To: Sean Reilly who wrote (2284)	12/9/1997 6:17:00 PM
From: Hunter Trout	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2615

<<So much for the reverse allowing for institutional investors to take notice>> I have never understood why reverse-splits are expected to attract institutional investors. Yes the price goes up, but it is artificial. Don't you think the institutions will notice that? Reverse-splits are always initiated from a position of weakness, whereas a buyback comes from strength and is more likely to result in sustained prices, and therefore more likely to be noticed. CAPR is merely behaving like a classic reverse-split and it's going to take a lot more than positive thinking to change that. The company may have a great product, but I'm afraid it's becoming ripe for a tag sale. Perhaps investors can emerge from this wreckage a bit wiser, and the next time they are asked to vote for a reverse-split, they'll run for for the nearest exit, or at the very least, just say no. Condolences to all, HT