Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jimmy who wrote (5258)	12/8/1997 11:50:00 PM
From: SE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10368

Jimmy, I did a quick and dirty 4th quarter estimate tonight and come up with $.12 minimum for the 4th quarter. If seasonality plays a factor we could end up with up to $.14 for the quarter, but I don't think much more than that. This is one thing I would gladly be incorrect on. GO PACK GO! -Scott PS -- After conversion I will be signing my messages: Dream A Lot! <<gg>>

To: jimmy who wrote (5258)	12/9/1997 7:26:00 AM
From: T.K. Allen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10368

Jimmy - I won't offer any quantitative earnings estimates for 1998 but I will offer a comment on your statement, "...no additional revenue sources for '98." This is being conservative to a fault. Given the breadth of expansion opportunities available to BNGO and the fact they will have a significant amount of new cash available from warrant call proceeds (I won't offer any quantitative guesses on that either), I think it is safe to say there will be some additional sources of revenue. TKA

To: jimmy who wrote (5258)	12/9/1997 8:56:00 AM
From: Joe Master	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10368

I think we need to generate a new term for the number of VGM's operated by the company. If a machine is in a AB&G Bingo center then it should be counted as a whole machine if it is located on a route (Darlington and others) and the profits are split with the site it is located in then (assuming a 50/50 split) it should only count as a 1/2 of a machine. If the split was different from this then the fraction used would be reflective of this as well. We would not make the same mistake as we did in the third qtr when estimating machines and revenues. Any comments. Joe Joel