Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (53982)	9/30/2013 2:19:54 AM
From: RMF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

It's all pretty basic stuff. en.wikipedia.org My 6 year old comments about it all the time at the dinner table... The Republicans are STILL gonna get CREAMED on it if they do some major damage to the economy.....

To: i-node who wrote (53982)	10/1/2013 3:22:06 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 85487

The real extortion occurred when the Senate took HR 3590, a bill that was passed by the House as "Service Members Home Ownership Tax Act of 2009". Nothing to do with health care. Because our Constitution requires that ALL revenue bills originate in the House, and Harry Reid couldn't get a bill out of the House, he gutted HR 3590, which had already passed, and put his OWN text in it. Including the title. Then passed it, and sent it back to the House where it was passed on a total party-line vote (after substantial political payoffs). You could reasonably make all sorts of negative comments about it, but I'm not sure how "extortion" fits here. Manipulation, deceit, dubious, arguably even unconstitutional could all fit, but where does extortion come in?