Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FMK who wrote (1616)	12/9/1997 8:32:00 AM
From: Paul Dubsky	Respond to of 27311

Until there's an official press release about VLNC, it's all just guess work. These assumptions sound rational, but, you never know. In the end, you've got to assess the risk, evaluate the market the company is in, determine if the company is legitimate and can make a product, for profit, and incorporate what the investment commmunity is saying about VLNC. All but "can the company make a product for profit" are answered, in my book, with "high risk (but very, very high reward), great market with enormous demand, legitimate company based on past deals, current partners/JVs, not sure if they can make a product for profit, and the investment community can't say enough about the potential of VLNC." Of course, the biggest issue is, can they make a product, cause of the rest ain't even worth wallpaper if they can't! Again, I always come back to the company VLNC keeps. Good luck to all. And to all, a good day. Paul

To: FMK who wrote (1616)	12/9/1997 12:53:00 PM
From: shasta23	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27311

HI FMK! You posted someone else's post where he stated that "people are buying this stock and i mean big money people " How does come up with this idea? The technical action of the stock is devastating lately and reflects a vote to trust the company less. I think Cal stood for some decency after the hyped and failed first attempt. Now the ole guard is back and that's not something that increases confidence in the company. That's why the price dropped. People remembered the law suit and Dawson's conncetion to it...now this guy is back...mmmhhh...will history repeat itself? I find it really that there is no statement to clarify the situation a little bit and take out some of the uncertainity related to the change. But i bet you have a positive spin on that one too! Stefan