Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (23777)	10/1/2013 12:26:46 PM
From: sixty2nds	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24758

<<<Gold bullion gapped down to a new low this morning after Crybaby failed to appear to announce surrender. That alone tells you why repubs should stand on principle.>>> Principle is principle. I don't need gold prices as proof to completely agree with what the Repubs should do as you suggest. I did need you to point out the flaw in my IR play. Thank you. I will let the stash of cash earn the yield. <<<At the same time gold stocks gapped down a little or not at all.>>> Whewee...hold your nose and breathe through your ears. I just looked at a LT ABX chart. It would appear odds favor a bottom is in. I haven't looked at gold for quite some time. (Blame it on my 15 year old mistress who hangs 'round topless) <<<For the Gold Bug what does this inconsistency show?>>> Everybody that wants gold has all they want. Brings to mind to the quantity of Lead and HiCap mags available.

To: ahhaha who wrote (23777)	10/1/2013 12:29:04 PM
From: Lhn5	Respond to of 24758

Lack of a CR is not a crisis.

To: ahhaha who wrote (23777)	10/1/2013 12:30:06 PM
From: Ahda	Respond to of 24758

George is pumping the wrong currency? Gold stocks have been so hammered and if it continues as is gold by means of lack of supply and limited producers is going to hit the roof and might just go through it. However gold is running close to par with gov movements 17 years ago. In the year 1996 you could easily purchase a house in my vicinity for around $300K today you are looking as close to $1m and over. The overs $1m are decent the unders close to tear downs. I guess George has been pumping over here too rather hawkishly as these prices are not chicken feed. Do you realize that only 36% of the people in Calif can afford a house. Better yet one out of every three employed californians is making the minium wage. So you have a little over a third of the people who can qualify for that average of $400 and some odd dollar house. I wonder if close to the two thirds of the CA population who moved to Mexico other than those from CA in the Ag business could create a economic boom?