SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Tankwatch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sandeep who wrote (27609)10/1/2013 12:49:26 PM
From: zax  Respond to of 32692
 
If it were illegal, all of the members of SI would be in jail.



To: sandeep who wrote (27609)10/1/2013 12:55:52 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32692
 
I believe it is criminal. I am sure there are laws on the books under which he could be prosecuted.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I can't figure out what's more toxic, Carl Icahn's potentially unethical activities around AAPL or the poisonous response from the media, coupled with something less than apathy from the general public.

Here's a guy who not only has access to a company that few, if any, of us will ever achieve, but he knows what will happen to the subject of his fodder the second he publishes his Tweets. And the public silently plays along. Where's the outrage?

thestreet.com



To: sandeep who wrote (27609)10/1/2013 3:54:42 PM
From: MGV1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Heywood40

  Respond to of 32692
 
Why not? If he were front running, it would be a different issue. He is stating his opinion. Hw owns it. He has bought more. He didn't distort or misstate anything factual.. That is more than can be said of too much of the financial media's distortions and misstatements about company fundamentals.