SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (743163)10/1/2013 6:52:37 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1576159
 
It's money that's ALREADY been allocated by the same (R) House that now refuses to pay the bill. They ate the meal, now they're stiffing the eatery.



To: i-node who wrote (743163)10/1/2013 11:12:56 PM
From: bentway1 Recommendation

Recommended By
combjelly

  Respond to of 1576159
 
In Congress, a not-so-brief case of delusion over government shutdown



By Dana Milbank, Published: September 30
washingtonpost.com

I almost shut down the government.

As I waited outside a meeting of the House Republican caucus in the Capitol basement Monday afternoon, I put down my briefcase next to a flowerpot and walked around the corner to catch lawmakers as they exited. Minutes later, an aide to Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) came bounding down the hall toward me, calling out, “Is that your bag?”

The Capitol police had identified it as a suspicious package and isolated it. Had I not claimed the briefcase, they may well have evacuated the Republicans from their strategy session — and I would have been responsible for them failing to come up with a final plan to avert the shutdown. As it turns out, the Republicans didn’t need help from me to blow things up.

Shortly after the briefcase incident, GOP lawmakers emerged touting their third list of demands that President Obama and the Democrats would have to meet. Like the previous two, this one was a non-starter, essentially requiring Obama to abandon the signature achievement of his presidency as the price for Republicans allowing the government to function.

Their original demand was that they would accept nothing less than the complete defunding of Obamacare.

Then they insisted that the health-care law be delayed by a year — and that Obama swallow a new oil pipeline, restrictions on medical malpractice lawsuits and contraceptive availability, and other poison pills.

Finally, they demanded a one-year delay of a linchpin of Obamacare, the individual mandate, and the end of health insurance subsidies for members of Congress, their staff members and the president’s political appointees.

The fact that Republicans kept scaling back their demands seemed to be confirmation that they were losing the battle for public opinion; a Washington Post-ABC News poll found that only one in four approve of their efforts. But did they really think it would help to make more obscure ultimatums?

Eliminate exchange subsidies for Schedule C federal employees or we’ll shut down the government! Yep, that’ll work.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) didn’t sound terribly convinced himself when he announced the Republicans’ last stand to reporters.

“The president provided, uh, a one-year delay of the employer mandate,” he said. “He’s provided exceptions, uh, for unions, uh, and others. Uh, there’s even an exception for members of Congress. Uh, we believe that, uh, everyone should be treated fairly, and so we’re going to move, uh, here in the next several hours, uh, to take, uh, the — the Senate bill, ah, add to it, uh, a one-year delay of the individual mandate on the American people.”

Although they claimed confidence that they were doing the right thing, Republicans were in a state of agitation as they moved toward the midnight deadline.

Rep. James Sensenbrenner (Wis.) was trying to flee the caucus meeting as CBS News’s Nancy Cordes asked him what would happen. “Well, we’ll see,” he replied.

“What do you think is going to happen?” she persisted.

“I don’t know,” he said, and when the questioning continued he snapped at the reporters: “I don’t like to do hallway interviews. You all know that.”

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was similarly irritable Monday afternoon when NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reminded him of opposition by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to House Republicans’ shutdown strategy. “I don’t care what John McCain thinks!” he blurted out. “Andrea, I don’t care what John McCain thinks!”

This was reminiscent of Rep. Darrell Issa’s explosion over the weekend, when Public Radio International’s Todd Zwillich asked him what he would do after the Senate rejected the House’s Obamacare gambits ( as it later did). “How dare you presume a failure?” the California Republican said. “How dare you! How dare you! How dare you presume a failure!

And they were worried about my briefcase?

Republican leaders marched the failure-in-waiting onto the House floor Monday night, where the level of debate was set by Rep. Jack Kingston (Ga.), who said of Obama: “Maybe the president of the United States can interrupt his negotiations with the Iranians and come talk to the Americans, i.e., Republican Americans.”

Is there any other kind?

Democrats howled about “extortion” and “hostage taking,” which Boehner seemed to confirm when he came to the floor and offered: “All the Senate has to do is say ‘yes,’ and the government is funded tomorrow.” It was the legislative equivalent of saying, “Give me the money and nobody gets hurt.”

A threatened rebellion by the small band of House GOP moderates failed to materialize, and, just three hours before midnight, House Republicans sent their politically explosive device to the Senate, which disposed of it like the suspicious package it was.



To: i-node who wrote (743163)10/1/2013 11:16:13 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576159
 
Romneycare vs. Obamacare: Lessons for today's 'shutdown' debacle (+video)



You won’t hear many Republicans say it, but Mitt Romney’s health-care insurance program in Massachusetts, seen as a model for the Affordable Care Act, has been largely successful and popular.
By Brad Knickerbocker, Staff writer / September 29, 2013

csmonitor.com

Back during the 2012 presidential campaign, President Obama had fun tweaking his Republican opponent about “Romneycare,” the health-care insurance program Mitt Romney had cited as one of the key successes of his time as governor of Massachusetts.

Romneycare, Mr. Obama said over and over, had been the model for the Affordable Care Act – "Obamacare" – now at the center of a highly toxic congressional debate that could see a government shutdown when the new fiscal year begins at midnight Monday.

[Latest update: The Republican-led House has tied a spending bill that would avert a shutdown to delaying Obamacare for one year. That kicks it back to the Senate, where Democratic leaders say that’s a no-go. The Senate isn’t scheduled to meet again until Monday, just hours before many federal programs could halt or be slowed down as hundreds of thousands of civilian employees are furloughed.]

Mr. Romney signed the Massachusetts program into law in 2006. So seven years later, how has it done? More to the political point, what do people in the Bay State think of their health-care insurance system – which, like Obamacare, includes an individual mandate requiring everyone to obtain coverage or face a fine and a marketplace where the uninsured can purchase coverage?

At first, there was a lot of skepticism in Massachusetts – from those on the right against “socialized medicine,” and from those on the left pushing for a single-payer system.

The Providence Journal next door in Rhode Island had this to say about Romneycare on its editorial page Sunday:

“The big difference between the programs is that the federal version puts more emphasis on controlling costs. That makes Obamacare arguably more conservative than the original Romneycare.

“For example, Obamacare proposes bundling payments for a medical condition. That means payment will be a set amount covering the soup-to-nuts treatment for an ailment, such as foot surgery. That removes incentives for ordering more tests or treatments than needed – while rewarding medical providers for doing a good job the first time around.

“It bears noting that Massachusetts is less generous in determining who gets subsidies. It helps pay for the coverage of those earning up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level. The federal government sets the limit for subsidies at up to 400 percent of the poverty level.”

So Obamacare is “more conservative” than Romneycare (at least in its original form), according to this analysis.

Romneycare got tweaked over the years, including in ways that control costs. As a result, the Providence newspaper points out, the fiscally conservative Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation has called Romneycare “a well thought-out piece of legislation.”

“There’s a lot of wild accusations that the law is breaking the bank in Massachusetts, and that is simply not the case,” foundation president Michael Widmer told Forbes during the 2012 presidential campaign. “I think the state’s healthcare reform has been a huge success and is probably the best policy achievement in the last 25 years.”

[EDIT: my bolding above and below]

A recent poll by the Massachusetts Medical Society, a statewide physician group, finds that most people in Massachusetts today are generally satisfied with the health-care system there.

“Eighty-four percent of residents expressed satisfaction with the care they received over the last year, including 56 percent who indicated they are ‘very satisfied’ and 28 percent who are ‘somewhat satisfied,’” the survey report states. Seventy-three percent of residents reported that gaining access to health care they need is “not difficult,” and for serious medical problems, 86 percent said the amount of time they needed to wait was not a problem.

While no health-care insurance system – private or public – is perfect, the bottom line in Massachusetts, as the Hill newspaper in Washington reported last month, is that “The vast majority of Massachusetts residents are satisfied with their healthcare under the state's 2006 reform law.”

That may have been what Sen. Ted Cruz (R) of Texas – chief opponent of Obamacare – was worrying about recently.

Speaking to fellow conservative Sean Hannity on Fox News, he warned that Americans would become so happy with Obamacare – “addicted” is the word he used – that opponents like himself would never be able to kill it.



To: i-node who wrote (743163)10/1/2013 11:29:05 PM
From: bentway1 Recommendation

Recommended By
tejek

  Respond to of 1576159
 
House GOP Fails To Pass Partial Government Funding Bills

DANIEL STRAUSS – OCTOBER 1, 2013, 8:12 PM EDThttp://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/house-gop-fails-to-pass-partial-government-funding-bills

( Has there been a more failed Speaker than Boner in modern times? )

Additional reporting by Dylan Scott

House Republicans on Tuesday evening failed to muster the two-thirds majority needed to pass a series of three partial government finding bills.

The three bills -- to fund veterans benefits, national parks and the District of Columbia -- were designed to increase pressure on Senate Democrats to resolve the government shutdown by making them take politically uncomfortable votes against funding popular government services.

The failure of the three bills -- a key portion of the House GOP's government shutdown strategy that emerged earlier in the day Tuesday -- adds additional uncertainty to a way out of the current impasse.

The vote on the veterans affairs bill was 264 to 164, on the District of Columbia bill was 265 to 163, and on the national parks and museums bill was 252 to 176. All three proposals needed a two thirds majority of the chamber to pass.

The failure of the three measures is an ironic twist in Congress's struggle with funding the government. The votes were designed as a trap for Democrats. House Republicans decided in a closed-door meeting on Tuesday afternoon that they would try to fund the government through piecemeal continuing resolutions.

After the vote, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) told TPM that House GOP leadership knew the bills were going to fail.

"We were told that that's what they were going to do," Cantor said. "To employ some sort of scorched-earth strategy."

A House Democratic aide told TPM that their side believes Republicans took the unusual procedural route because otherwise Democrats would have had a chance to put a clean spending bill on the floor, which they believe would pass. House leadership has refused to put a clean bill on the floor.

House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) told TPM that the House would bring the legislation up Wednesday under regular order, which would only require a majority vote.

It's likely to pass then, but it isn't going anywhere. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (R-NV) has already rejected a piecemeal approach to funding the government, and the White House has threatened to veto any piecemeal legislation.

Another House Democratic aide told TPM that Tuesday's vote and the one coming Wednesday are therefore effectively stall tactics.

"They clearly know this isn’t going anywhere," the aide said after the vote. "This was solely a face-saving measure because the American people are blaming them for shutting down the government."

Cantor took the opportunity to blast House Democrats for blocking the votes in his comments to TPM.

"The people who are suffering right now don't really care about those kinds of games," he said. "What we're trying to do is answer the problems where we can agree. I think most people would expect if you have disagreements, set them aside, and do those which you can agree on."

The failure of the three resolutions are also a defeat for Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Mike Lee (R-UT), who took credit for the plan earlier on Tuesday, shortly after the House GOP announced that it was moving forward with the proposals.

In a speech on the Senate floor, Lee said he wanted Congress to fund certain parts of the federal government but not Obamacare.

"My plan, in other words, would involve setting up segmented continuing resolutions, appropriations measures that would keep the funding going at current levels to various areas with government," Lee said during the speech. Let's leave Obamacare for another day and not hold the vast majority of government functions hostage when the vast majority of government functions don't have anything to do with the implementation of Obamacare."

Similarly, Cruz's office said the votes were rooted in an idea Cruz suggested days earlier.