Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BGM who wrote (6706)	12/9/1997 10:14:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

BGM AS in all instances for all situations, you are both right to some degree, and also wrong. You are correct that no DD has proven the vast potential of its claims. However, you are wrong in the respect that IPM has proven that gold does exist on the BRX property.(albeit in small enough quantities to render it uneconomical) Likwise, Naxos has proven the existence of both gold and platinum at FL. (the naysayers can repeat whatever mantra they want, but it has been proven) What needs to be proven further is how much? How much is there, and how much does it cost to get out? In regards to opinions on how to/not to respond to the naysayers, the same holds true. They have every right to say whatever they want, as long as it is truthfull and honest(most of it is not)When they are purposively disruptive, I feel that it is appropriate to ignore them. I think that MOST people see through their pale facade of reasoning and will not be deterred. If anyone still has questions, feel free to email someone that you trust. Call one of the IR people at Naxos, or email someone on the thread. Information is still available if you want to access it. Mark